Describe the bug
KafkaWriter.write() (src/writers/writer_kafka.py) retries the flush, and when messages are still pending after the last attempt it logs a WARNING and falls through:
if isinstance(remaining, int) and remaining > 0:
logger.warning("Kafka flush timed out with messages still pending.", extra={...})
A pure timeout appends nothing to errors and raises nothing, so the if errors: branch is never reached and write() returns normally. _write_to_all() counts Kafka in writers_ok and the request returns 202, while the message may never have been delivered.
Only a WARNING records it, so an alarm on level = "ERROR" is blind to this by construction — and ADR-002's count(ERROR) == count(5xx) invariant holds here only because the request is never considered failed at all.
Steps to Reproduce
- Configure a topic with a Kafka writer and a reachable broker, so the producer initializes and
produce() succeeds.
- Make the broker unable to acknowledge the write while keeping the connection alive — e.g. take the partition leader offline after produce, or set
min.insync.replicas above the number of live in-sync replicas.
POST /topics/{topic_name} with a valid message.
flush() returns remaining > 0 on all 3 attempts (KAFKA_FLUSH_RETRIES, 7s timeout each per KAFKA_FLUSH_TIMEOUT) and raises no KafkaException.
- Observe the response:
202, with kafka listed in writers_ok.
- Observe the logs: one
WARNING ("Kafka flush timed out with messages still pending."), zero ERROR.
Expected state
A message whose delivery was never confirmed must not be reported to the caller as written.
202 is meant to mean "accepted by every configured sink". Either the response reflects that the Kafka write did not complete, or writers_ok stops listing a sink whose delivery is unconfirmed — but a caller must not be told the message landed when the service does not know that it did.
Impact / Severity
High
Attachments / Evidence
src/writers/writer_kafka.py — flush loop, terminal timeout branch, and the if errors: gate that the timeout path never reaches:
# Warn if messages still pending after retries
if isinstance(remaining, int) and remaining > 0:
logger.warning(
"Kafka flush timed out with messages still pending.",
extra={"pending_messages": remaining, "flush_timeout_sec": _KAFKA_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_SEC},
)
duration_ms = round((time.perf_counter() - started_at) * 1000, 2)
if errors: # <- empty on a pure timeout
...
raise WriteError(failure_text)
logger.debug("Kafka accepted the message.", ...) # <- reached instead
errors is appended to only by delivery_report (on a delivery error) and by the two except KafkaException blocks. A flush that simply does not drain in time hits none of them.
Related / References
Two options, and the choice is a product decision rather than a cleanup:
- Treat a terminal flush timeout as a
WriteError. Correct on the contract, but it turns a current 202 into a 500, so it is a caller-visible behaviour change.
- Keep the
202 and alarm on this specific WARNING, treating unconfirmed delivery as an operational signal rather than a request failure.
Option 1 is the honest one if 202 is meant to mean "accepted by every configured sink". Whichever is chosen, the decision belongs in ADR-002 and writers_ok must stop reporting an unconfirmed sink as OK.
Acceptance:
- Decision recorded in ADR-002 §Logging strategy.
writers_ok no longer reports a sink whose delivery was never confirmed.
- Unit test covers flush timeout with
remaining > 0 and no raised exception.
Related: ADR-002 (adr/002-observability/002-observability.md), #193, PR #204, #219 — the other invariant gap found in the same review.
Describe the bug
KafkaWriter.write()(src/writers/writer_kafka.py) retries the flush, and when messages are still pending after the last attempt it logs aWARNINGand falls through:A pure timeout appends nothing to
errorsand raises nothing, so theif errors:branch is never reached andwrite()returns normally._write_to_all()counts Kafka inwriters_okand the request returns202, while the message may never have been delivered.Only a
WARNINGrecords it, so an alarm onlevel = "ERROR"is blind to this by construction — and ADR-002'scount(ERROR) == count(5xx)invariant holds here only because the request is never considered failed at all.Steps to Reproduce
produce()succeeds.min.insync.replicasabove the number of live in-sync replicas.POST /topics/{topic_name}with a valid message.flush()returnsremaining > 0on all 3 attempts (KAFKA_FLUSH_RETRIES, 7s timeout each perKAFKA_FLUSH_TIMEOUT) and raises noKafkaException.202, withkafkalisted inwriters_ok.WARNING("Kafka flush timed out with messages still pending."), zeroERROR.Expected state
A message whose delivery was never confirmed must not be reported to the caller as written.
202is meant to mean "accepted by every configured sink". Either the response reflects that the Kafka write did not complete, orwriters_okstops listing a sink whose delivery is unconfirmed — but a caller must not be told the message landed when the service does not know that it did.Impact / Severity
High
Attachments / Evidence
src/writers/writer_kafka.py— flush loop, terminal timeout branch, and theif errors:gate that the timeout path never reaches:errorsis appended to only bydelivery_report(on a delivery error) and by the twoexcept KafkaExceptionblocks. A flush that simply does not drain in time hits none of them.Related / References
Two options, and the choice is a product decision rather than a cleanup:
WriteError. Correct on the contract, but it turns a current202into a500, so it is a caller-visible behaviour change.202and alarm on this specificWARNING, treating unconfirmed delivery as an operational signal rather than a request failure.Option 1 is the honest one if
202is meant to mean "accepted by every configured sink". Whichever is chosen, the decision belongs in ADR-002 andwriters_okmust stop reporting an unconfirmed sink as OK.Acceptance:
writers_okno longer reports a sink whose delivery was never confirmed.remaining > 0and no raised exception.Related: ADR-002 (
adr/002-observability/002-observability.md), #193, PR #204, #219 — the other invariant gap found in the same review.