Skip to content

discussion: qemu microvm as a provider on linux? #19

Description

@kaplan-michael

Hey,

I wonder why Firecracker was chosen for the Linux backend over QEMU. Would QEMU microvm make sense here, especially since it could give us live virtiofs worktrees and potentially simpler gvproxy integration while still keeping a minimal KVM VM?

I'm happy to try and come up with a quick PoC.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions