From 90b7e478933daf00233b0678f99a301e7b112cb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philipp Ahmann <2428012+pahmann@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:25:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Update structural coverage reference from unit to component As the lowest element we referring structural coverage is the "component" on which we measure the coverage this helps understanding that the coverage value of the components are placed in the report. This also helps that we do not further need to specify which units should be added Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <2428012+pahmann@users.noreply.github.com> --- .../process_areas/verification/verification_workproducts.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/process/process_areas/verification/verification_workproducts.rst b/process/process_areas/verification/verification_workproducts.rst index 8d2cc2a18eb..ab9b876ef86 100644 --- a/process/process_areas/verification/verification_workproducts.rst +++ b/process/process_areas/verification/verification_workproducts.rst @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ Module (can be several levels), passed/failed and completeness verdict, including normal operation and failure reactions - The list of requirements may also contain other verification methods like "Analysis" - - Structural Coverage (C0 and C1, from unit testing on host) per unit + - Structural Coverage (C0 and C1, from unit testing on host) per component - Static Code Analysis (including compiler warnings, automated checking of coding guidelines and additional checks) - Formal evidence about the performed DFA From 15a4f397d291084c9b5d94219c92a6712570ef37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philipp Ahmann <2428012+pahmann@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 07:28:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] improve wording for structural coverage Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <2428012+pahmann@users.noreply.github.com> --- .../process_areas/verification/verification_workproducts.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/process/process_areas/verification/verification_workproducts.rst b/process/process_areas/verification/verification_workproducts.rst index ab9b876ef86..c581f965b1d 100644 --- a/process/process_areas/verification/verification_workproducts.rst +++ b/process/process_areas/verification/verification_workproducts.rst @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ Module (can be several levels), passed/failed and completeness verdict, including normal operation and failure reactions - The list of requirements may also contain other verification methods like "Analysis" - - Structural Coverage (C0 and C1, from unit testing on host) per component + - Structural Coverage (C0 and C1, from unit testing on host) per component (to map any shortcomings to the component requirement level) - Static Code Analysis (including compiler warnings, automated checking of coding guidelines and additional checks) - Formal evidence about the performed DFA