Lucarelli visualization

[plakrisenko]

I am not sure that I correctly identified data from the figures in the original publication.
So the notes in the measurements table and the visualization table (the rightmost column) are just my guesses.

[stephanmg]

Can I somewhere preview the visualization? Could you add please an image?

[plakrisenko]

Fig.1 , A

Is there supposed to be an offset?

[stephanmg]

Axis label is nan - that should be corrected.

[plakrisenko]

Fig.1, B

vs

[plakrisenko]

I am to sure what this figure is:

Could be Fig. 3, A, the first blue bar:

However, I don't see the rest in the measurements table.

[stephanmg]

Unclear for me as well, first figure is okay.

[plakrisenko]

Fig. 2, D, right column. These seem to match the publication

[plakrisenko]

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3, 1-4 (different initial conditions)

[stephanmg]

LGTM, thanks Polina!

[m-philipps]

The plots look good! Is there a way to do the visualisation without adding a column without header to the measurement table?

[plakrisenko]

The plots look good! Is there a way to do the visualisation without adding a column without header to the measurement table?

This column is not needed and can be removed. Do you think it could be helpful to move this information to the simulations table, or remove completely?

[stephanmg]

Thanks for the contribution.

[dilpath]

The plots look good! Is there a way to do the visualisation without adding a column without header to the measurement table?

This column is not needed and can be removed. Do you think it could be helpful to move this information to the simulations table, or remove completely?

I think it's nice to keep. I think the column in the visualization table is probably enough, since it can be used to both identify the figure that is reproduced, and the data that goes into the figure. Call it e.g. paper_figure.

[dilpath]

Thanks!

[m-philipps]

Thanks!