Skip to content

Sharpen selected nested-width coefficient to K/N < 3.070 via truncated sources - #5067

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
JoyboyBrian:brian/imb-b2-03
Oct 23, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
JoyboyBrian:brian/imb-b2-03

Conversation

@JoyboyBrian

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change and mathematical scope

Improve the selected #4470 compiler's mathematical nested-width upper coefficient from K/N < 3.639 to K/N < 3.070, answering #5026's truncated-source handoff. The selected κ, batching, completions, splitting and physical assumptions are unchanged.

exact root eligibility + nonroot missing-parent demand
  -> every source rank s > n/M
  -> S_n < (T1/(n/M)) sum_d P1^d T1^(G-d)
  -> fully charged P1 < T1 <= U
  -> ceil(log2 B_N)/(HN) < 3.070

All proof-relevant predecessor bytes are retained with original-head/path/hash attribution; live replay pins use this contribution's own history. Credit Sagar Thakrar (#5026), James Reed/jwr404, Mark/Matarener, zxv, Cinna Davis, Jacob Alan Sussman, Ryanson Jonathan and mihir-s-05. Prepared by JoyboyBrian with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance. Investigation: #5061.

Validation

  • Before: Bound #4470's complex row coefficient within 5/4 (no new κ) #5026 uses the untruncated full-layer upper envelope, with Xhi=233670787813430 and K/N<3.639.

  • After: the uniform all-layer rank-weight inequality gives X=197115103572543 and K/N<3.070. Six actual selected v=1 boundary fixtures and twelve tiny literal chronological flows agree on complete source spectra. The concrete 3624 -> 3625 source-count decrease rejects monotone interpolation.

  • Registered normal/-O replay passes; six semantic controls reject. Git-free replay passes; source and receipt mutations reject. Committed-byte/source-history preflight passes at 103f8130fe617e8c720af4cb6ce63cf638085d76. No product histogram or integer of size N is materialized.

  • A separate Astra agent reviewed the exact-head proof, source bytes and checker without findings; its independent partial-Pascal fixture agrees on the complete source spectrum. This is AI-assisted review, not human or proof-kernel acceptance.

Merge Danger

Door: Two-way.

Blast Radius: Research.

Only a new scoped package. This is an author-checked uniform source-count argument with finite calibration, not physical stock/route admission, an optimal width, a new outer cutoff or a multiplication theorem. Native, ownership, whole-job, precision/tape and analytic/recovery hypotheses remain inherited and unrun.

Task and overlap

Refined selected-stock-envelope task b2_math_truncated_source_envelope, canonical claim. Scientific base 4c0a359d88f22f05189d51f48387750b801a45d4, refreshed unchanged before submission; priority revision 7. PR5026 exact head 6e1e7d47ed7fd7f3f7197cad7c19f8237c062b06 supplies the existing bracket and asks for retained eligibility. This proves the missing input source envelope; it does not redo the outer cutoff or the separate physical stock interface. Source heads and retained bytes are recorded in the package. Overlap refreshed 2026-10-23 07:37 UTC: 318 open PR bodies, 4159 Discussion records and all 6760 local notes; subsequent local claim check finds the canonical claim. Arbitrary diffs and unpublished work remain outside coverage.

Credit

See the retained notices and package attribution; predecessor credit and substantial AI assistance are stated above.

Open next questions

The package questions separate sharper fractional-moment source bounds from the unimplemented physical stock/ownership/routing interface. Start with the same nonroot absence indicator and fully charged completion mass; no new histogram or outer-root calculation is required.

Reproduce on macOS arm64 / CPython 3.12.7: python3.12 scripts/research_package.py --package research/selected-truncated-source-envelope. Targeted checks only; full selected/native, physical tape and proof-kernel validation were not run.

@Mister-Meeseeks
Mister-Meeseeks merged commit 9269eea into CrocSwap:main Oct 23, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants