Repository navigation
Derive first-pivot Schur state weights from sector incidence - #5072
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change and mathematical scope
Derive the first-pivot input multiplicities left open by the complementary-plane continuation handoff, using scalar sector incidence rather than the previous 496-split/GL4 census.
The binary scalar incidence-sum formula is proved for arbitrary sector dimensions; sufficient residual normal forms are proved only for profile (1,1,1,2). Input incidence, complete-header fibres, and centralizer multiplicities are kept distinct. Exact retained successor README bytes preserve Sagar Thakrar's continuation proof/table and credit; composing that credited premise recovers 93564 headers without claiming another continuation theorem or a new kappa.
Validation
93bebe5e1ad3dd17a97ae79f27e1a35edd3630aaimported them explicitly. After: image/kernel incidence derives all seven weights, including the first weights 1 and 3 before centralizers enter.-Ochecks pass: 31 canonical tuples with actual invertible intertwiners, 30 dimension-two/three direct split controls, five semantic rejections, retained-byte authentication and exact output replay. No GL4 or full 496-split enumeration. Commit-byte/source-history and archive integrity checks pass.Merge Danger
Door: two-way. Isolated research package; no selected result or existing code changes.
Blast Radius: research. The continuation numerical table is source-bound but not independently replayed here. General residual classification, physical header costs and supplier admission remain open. No Lean, Docker, production build or selected cold replay was run.
Task and overlap
Refined task
b2_math_schur_split_incidenceon cardformal-interface-lemma; canonical investigation. Scientific base4c0a359d88f22f05189d51f48387750b801a45d4, priority revision7; refreshed canonical main is unchanged at the submission checkpoint. Exact dependency heads and retained source/path/hash records are in the scoped package. The claim states predecessor coverage, changed premise, live parallel exclusions and bounded stop rule. Arbitrary diffs and unpublished work are outside overlap coverage.Credit
Mihir Srivastava #4689; ssafwann #4678/#4671; thakrarsagar complementary-plane successor; Nick Petalas #4915/#4597; MatShep #4762; codyw912 #4735; Ryanson Jonathan, lee-phys and Cinna Davis. Substantial OpenAI Codex assistance is disclosed; retained source-specific attribution and licenses are preserved.
Open next questions
See the package questions for the smallest remaining caller/interface obligation and its blocker. This contribution stops at the stated scoped result.
Reproduce with CPython3.12 on macOS arm64:
python3.12 scripts/research_package.py --package research/schur-split-incidence. A separate Astra review of this exact HEAD found no actionable issue and reran normal/optimized targeted checks. Scientific review remains AI-assisted, not human or proof-kernel acceptance.