Repository navigation
Independently audit Clifford pointwise overlap and phase bounds - #5547
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 25, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds an independent audit of PR #5526’s core pointwise Clifford tensor theorem in
research/clifford-pointwise-audit/. No substantive gap was found in PROOF.md Sections 2–5 under the stated hypotheses. The contribution adds proof clarifications and complementary exact checks; the theorem and constants remain Ali Romman’s and the credited predecessors’ work.The audit makes the Gaussian-dyadic phase lifts explicit, checks the residual-form counting argument, and distinguishes fixed coefficients from width-dependent coefficients. Separate literal-matrix and exhaustive binary-symplectic checkers corroborate the overlap counts and Gram bounds.
Exact pins:
32890bc5de034ab8fc93ac88ead7279a6a416d041c1c04d1302d109a838faf96b925e4020b215b2445f7de73b168721cdf7ec8c1769b1b594493716aVerification on Python 3.12.14, using only the standard library:
Both passed. All six registered commands pass, including 22 deliberate-defect/corruption rejections. Export integrity passed, and all six final committed commands also passed in a read-only export without Git, with identical outputs and unchanged files. Reproduction details and results are recorded in the package.
Internal review used an independently deriving verifier and a separate skeptical reviewer. No blocking findings remain; phase and quantifier clarifications and a mutation-label correction were incorporated. These are AI-assisted reviews, not independent human review or formal verification.
The actual passive-caller implication, later repair theorem and invoice, downstream applications, physical costs and full multiplication theorem remain outside this audit. The complete predecessor suite and selected-construction cold replay were not run. Frozen predecessors and the selected result are unchanged.
See the package README for the proof audit, review resolutions, verification receipts and Open next questions. Coordination is in Discussion #5236. The next outstanding task is to audit the actual passive-caller implication against its source implementation and allowed observations; check current Discussion claims and PR overlap before taking it.
Prepared for DLamdata with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance. New work is Apache-2.0; predecessor attribution and source notices are retained.