Repository navigation
Prove one-field sector workspace floor with rational overwrites (no κ) - #5910
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 27, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 27, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Scoped algebraic proof with finite corroboration: the formal Boolean-sector perturbation family needs exactly one owned workspace field even when arbitrary rational scalar overwrites and free ordinary linear mixing are allowed. Any finite number of arbitrary dirty borrowed fields may be used and restored. This settles the scalar-overwrite workspace question explicitly left open by Ali Romman's PR #5658.
The new contribution is the enlarged-alphabet lower bound, produced by Nick Petalas. PR #5658's one-field butterfly is cited for the matching upper bound, without replaying or auditing its implementation. Credit Ali Romman, Dugongue's T6/T7 and C8, PR #5626's sector interface and the retained Nick Petalas, Cao, DaysSky, Cinna Davis, Ryanson, zxv and Jacob Alan Sussman native/controller/compiler lineage. Determinant and character methods are classical. No new kappa or selected-frontier change.
Evidence
Before, the workspace proof excluded nonunit scales such as 3/2 because it used invertibility modulo three. After, a characteristic-zero paired-character invariant covers every rational scale and even arbitrary matrices over the ordinary involution algebra. Singular ordinary gates remain covered by the determinant equality.
Local CPython 3.12.15 verification passes at head
257e79abda93a7d586439727e9a00435a43ca4af:PASS_SECTOR_SCALAR_WORKSPACEandPASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE.PASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTESfor all eight package files, including full source-history preflight against the ancestral main base.Exact reproduction from the repository root:
Use the local CPython 3.12 path on another machine. Only the standard library is needed. The standalone checker has no predecessor executable dependency. The source README/proof and originating card are pinned as historical provenance.
Limitations and unrun obligations
The all-parameter result is a written proof for fixed finite B-linear words in the formal faithful-sector algebra. Ordinary matrices have coefficients in the involution algebra; Q-dependent ordinary overwrites, nonlinear/adaptive instructions and discarded borrowed outputs are outside the contract. Exact dirty restoration is essential. The finite checks corroborate the written proof; they do not enumerate all programs.
No extension of the predecessor's r+1 CLEAR-count lower bound is claimed. No physical native implementation, full caller, precision/tape/stock ledger, complete supplier, selected cold replay, Lean or Docker replay was run. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed. The selected frontier and five framework assumptions are unchanged.
Canonical main was fetched at entry and before submission and remains
de5ec2e7a6074068452f45b1a191b5c72832df4a, priority revision 8. Live text overlap included all 459 open PR records and 5,402 Discussion records with complete reported pagination, this account's latest 200 PR bodies, current handoff comments and batch-independent source reservations. All-main README searches and merged PR searches found the source's explicit question, rather than a delivered enlarged-alphabet theorem. Sparse local helper coverage is incomplete; arbitrary diffs and unpublished work are outside that novelty check. The advance CLAIM records the exact question and scope.Open next questions
Related open work
No open PR on the same Boolean-sector scalar-overwrite workspace question was found in the inspected live metadata. Adjacent open work is distinguished explicitly:
The completion refresh inspected this account's seven other open PRs created since the advance CLAIM: #5909 and #5911 through #5916. Their questions concern target-partition fees, colored batching, rounded-shear history, carry-state information, cyclic quotient size, carry frequency and tensor phase recovery. None studies this Boolean-sector scalar-overwrite workspace quantity or computes a conflicting same-instance value. No additional related line or numerical comparison is required by that refresh.
CI notes
Hosted CI has not certified this package. At commit
257e79abda93a7d586439727e9a00435a43ca4af, run 40506014706 finished with plan failed; replay skipped.The only failed step was Onboarding helper tests. All ten failure/error entries are in unchanged
tests/test_research_current_assignment.py, endingFAILED (failures=8, errors=2, skipped=22). The two errors areKeyError: 'follow_up_steps'andKeyError: 'catalog_first_step'. The eight assertion failures concern frozen-card/current-command routing (0 != 16), missing current/historical references (ValueError not raisedin five cases), and sparse omission lists (two cases).All ten failure/error headers match PR #5911's plan log exactly; both logs were inspected. This confirms the reported shared onboarding failure on main
de5ec2e7a6074068452f45b1a191b5c72832df4a. The failure is outside this package. Maintainers will address it; no shared source, workflow or onboarding test was changed.The package replay was skipped. Hosted replay has not certified the package; only the local checks listed above have run. No package-specific failure was reported by this run.
Merge danger
Two-way door. Blast radius: isolated. Eight new files in one research package; shared implementations, frozen predecessors, source archives and selected records are unchanged. Apache-2.0.