Repository navigation
Prove sharp 68-point E8 plane unions and isolate the P104 puncture step (no κ) - #6221
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 30, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Prove the sharp 68-point union bound for two affine codimension-two live sets in the full 120-line E8 quadratic shell, and classify every equality case. Claim type: scoped written proof with finite exact corroboration. The new classification reduces the counting part of Matarener's PR6218 hand-proof question to one puncture-specific obligation.
The last puncture assertion remains open here, as does compatible-plane disjointness. This ships the first verified partial step from the advance CLAIM; the narrower delivered scope was recorded in the progress update.
Only
research/p104-quadratic-union-reduction/is added. This contribution was produced by Nick Petalas. Credit Matarener's PR6218 at159352d273bd7b9f92c55cee3a9ac9b955de9b86for the question, B-form/compatibility reduction and E8/2E8 model; DreamingOfClouds and the retained decoder/P104 lineage; Ali Romman and the retained native/caller/compiler contributors. Classical quadratic Gauss sums retain their credit. The older PR3253 already reports 68 for a punctured P112 two-flat census, and PR3269 uses signed Gauss sums for individual affine supports. The new contribution is the full-E8 proof, complete equality classification and P104 reduction; those predecessor results are not audited or claimed again.Evidence
Before: PR6218 uses a finite P104 66-union bound in its open geometric proof route. After: the written proof isolates exactly the exceptional full-E8 configuration that needs puncture information; a literal 68-point fixture shows why full-E8 counting alone cannot prove 66.
Local CPython 3.12.15 checks pass:
5f5e7fc87844f265ec5b206b2ed2e690f202f879. Canonical main was refreshed before committing and remaineda5bff3bf133e482541c09eba4e773884bdb2b1b7.Exact reproduction from the repository root:
Elsewhere substitute a CPython 3.12 executable. Expected markers:
PASS_P104_QUADRATIC_UNION_REDUCTION,PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE ... outcome=partial, andPASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES.Limitations
This is a proof reduction, not the source's puncture inequality, compatibility lemma or decoder floor. It supplies no physical word, restoration/ownership contract, native implementation, complete signed invoice, supplier admission, new kappa or complete multiplication theorem. The selected result and five framework assumptions remain unchanged. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed. No predecessor scientific replay, Lean, Docker or full selected cold replay was run or needed for the stated theorem.
Open next questions
Related open work
Live open PRs, the latest handoffs and active Discussions, recent account work, local reservations and main/merged searches were checked before claiming and before committing. The overlap helper had complete pagination for 337 open PRs and 5,947 Discussion records; its sparse local-note coverage was incomplete, so targeted main-tree searches and relevant full notes were read separately. This bounded coverage is not proof of global novelty. No extra computations checked another contribution's numbers.
CI notes
Hosted CI is pending at
5f5e7fc87844f265ec5b206b2ed2e690f202f879. No hosted pass or failure is claimed. Both registered commands and every required local package/publication check passed. No required local proof obligation was left unrun; the mathematical limitations above are explicit open questions.Merge Danger
Door: two-way.
Blast Radius: isolated.
One new research package. Shared code, frozen evidence and selected artifacts are unchanged.