Skip to content

LLMObs: async propagation example#11821

Closed
ygree wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ygree/llmobs-async-propagation-example
Closed

LLMObs: async propagation example#11821
ygree wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ygree/llmobs-async-propagation-example

Conversation

@ygree

@ygree ygree commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

  • Format the title according to the contribution guidelines
  • Assign the type: and (comp: or inst:) labels in addition to any other useful labels
  • Avoid using close, fix, or any linking keywords when referencing an issue
    Use solves instead, and assign the PR milestone to the issue
  • Update the CODEOWNERS file on source file addition, migration, or deletion
  • Update public documentation with any new configuration flags or behaviors
  • Add your completed PR to the merge queue by commenting /merge. You can also:
    • Customize the commit message associated with the merge with /merge --commit-message "..."
    • Remove your PR from the merge queue with /merge -c
    • Skip all merge queue checks with /merge -f --reason "reason"; please use this judiciously, as some checks do not run at the PR-level (note: the PR still needs to be mergeable, this will only skip the pre-merge build)
    • Get more information in this doc

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

@ygree ygree self-assigned this Jul 1, 2026
@ygree ygree added the tag: do not merge Do not merge changes label Jul 1, 2026
@datadog-official

datadog-official Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 54.95% (-0.02%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 6d40f0e | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟡 Java Benchmark SLOs — Performance SLO warning (near threshold)

Suite Status
Startup 🟡 warning

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 14.01 s 13.95 s [-0.3%; +1.2%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 12.90 s 13.01 s [-1.5%; -0.1%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 17.48 s 16.61 s [+1.1%; +9.4%] (significantly worse)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 17.26 s 17.43 s [-1.9%; -0.1%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 17.47 s 17.48 s [-1.4%; +1.3%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 17.51 s 17.49 s [-0.9%; +1.2%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.07 s 16.63 s [-7.4%; +0.6%] (no difference)

Commit: 6d40f0ed · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

@ygree ygree closed this Jul 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

tag: do not merge Do not merge changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant