Skip to content

Translate README to English, remove brmangue-specific bug narrative - #5

Merged
profsergiocosta merged 1 commit into
developfrom
cleaning
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

Translate README to English, remove brmangue-specific bug narrative#5
profsergiocosta merged 1 commit into
developfrom
cleaning

Conversation

@profsergiocosta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Removed sections that only made sense with examples/brmangue_validation/ present: the open disk+Flood+Mangrove divergence problem, TerraME validation walkthrough, and the 'why brmangue tests live in examples/' rationale (moot now that the directory is gone)
  • Generalized 'halo=1 insufficient for FloodModel' into a domain-agnostic finding about halo depth = dependency chain depth, not shift radius, keeping the core lesson and real numbers without naming BR-MANGUE model classes
  • Generalized the boundary_value=0 finding to a generic domain example instead of BR-MANGUE's SOLO_CANAL_FLUVIAL specifics
  • Trimmed equivalence-tests and disk-layer sections to only the tests that still exist in this repo
  • Verified: all runnable code blocks in the new README behave identically (same pass/fail pattern) to the original Portuguese version -- no new bugs introduced by the rewrite
  • Full pytest suite still 79 passed, 1 skipped

- Removed sections that only made sense with examples/brmangue_validation/
  present: the open disk+Flood+Mangrove divergence problem, TerraME
  validation walkthrough, and the 'why brmangue tests live in examples/'
  rationale (moot now that the directory is gone)
- Generalized 'halo=1 insufficient for FloodModel' into a domain-agnostic
  finding about halo depth = dependency chain depth, not shift radius,
  keeping the core lesson and real numbers without naming BR-MANGUE
  model classes
- Generalized the boundary_value=0 finding to a generic domain example
  instead of BR-MANGUE's SOLO_CANAL_FLUVIAL specifics
- Trimmed equivalence-tests and disk-layer sections to only the tests
  that still exist in this repo
- Verified: all runnable code blocks in the new README behave
  identically (same pass/fail pattern) to the original Portuguese
  version -- no new bugs introduced by the rewrite
- Full pytest suite still 79 passed, 1 skipped
@profsergiocosta
profsergiocosta merged commit 03c3046 into develop Sep 4, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants