Skip to content

docs(proof): journal paging-only has_more as the product rule - #258

Merged
tonyketcham merged 1 commit into
stack/toeknee-figma/fix/proof-read-completeness/expose-read-completeness--4cbd9019from
toeknee/proof-journal-pr-254-review
Aug 22, 2026
Merged

docs(proof): journal paging-only has_more as the product rule#258
tonyketcham merged 1 commit into
stack/toeknee-figma/fix/proof-read-completeness/expose-read-completeness--4cbd9019from
toeknee/proof-journal-pr-254-review

Conversation

@tonyketcham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Addresses the two open 22 Aug journal-quality notes on #254. No envelope code changed.

  1. The Finding that used Issue kind gap is superseded by a retrospective Finding. The gap itself is now Issue iss-pr-254-journal-used-issue-kind-on-a-finding-and--9p7t7amz79y5rn3b.
  2. Accepted Decision dec-treat-page-has-more-as-pagination-only--dv24ta688adf262v states the product rule as the Choice (page.has_more is pagination-only; unpaired hasMore is refused; hard caps stay on complete / cap_reasons). The five-file split is a note. Accepted with rejectSiblings: false. The prior file-split Decision is superseded.

Related #254.

Test plan

  • Proof CLI mutations only (no hand-edited frontmatter)
  • Other proposed Decisions in the Effort remain proposed
  • Prettier on the new records

Made with Cursor

The 22 Aug review of #254 asked to record that page.has_more is
pagination-only, not a five-file split, and to stop using Issue kind
on the Finding.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Change-Id: I18e831209621f3373523f5c0b2aa3acceafed031
@tonyketcham
tonyketcham merged commit 55673a2 into stack/toeknee-figma/fix/proof-read-completeness/expose-read-completeness--4cbd9019 Aug 22, 2026
21 of 22 checks passed
@tonyketcham
tonyketcham deleted the toeknee/proof-journal-pr-254-review branch August 22, 2026 17:42

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved. Cursor Bugbot completed with no findings that need human review, and no approval policy requires a human reviewer. No reviewers were assigned.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant