Skip to content

docs(loop): reconcile initiative state - #321

Merged
abiorh-claw merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/ws-docs-003-initiative-state-cleanup
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

docs(loop): reconcile initiative state#321
abiorh-claw merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/ws-docs-003-initiative-state-cleanup

Conversation

@Abiorh001

@Abiorh001 Abiorh001 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Workstream PR Trust Bundle

Chunk

small-change - reconcile initiative state

Goal

Make durable initiative entry pages agree with merged main and remove retired workflow language from live contributor-facing state.

Intent And Planning Context

  • Intent: one oversight-only documentation cleanup after the end-to-end initiative audit.
  • Chunk contract: small documentation change; scope is stated in this PR.

What Changed

  • Corrected DB-001, ARCH-001, QUAL-002, and CI-003 merged state.
  • Reduced AUTH status from chronological execution history to durable capability and remaining-boundary truth.
  • Marked POL-002 standalone future inference as superseded by POL-003.
  • Removed obsolete CON main-SHA, migration-head, and local-worktree claims.
  • Removed date-frozen ART status wording.
  • Added DB-001 to the central initiative ledger.

Why It Changed

Contributors could mistake merged chunks, retired signed-start/post-merge processes, or old branch and migration facts for current work.

Design Chosen

Keep CURRENT_STATE and concise initiative STATUS pages as current durable truth; retain chunk contracts, review evidence, and Git history as historical exact-change evidence. Open PRs remain the transient-work view.

Alternatives Rejected

  • A post-merge reconciler or second memory PR: recreates the stale/racing workflow this cleanup removes.
  • Deleting historical contracts and reviews: loses useful exact-change evidence.

Scope Control

Allowed Files Changed

  • .agent-loop/CURRENT_STATE.md
  • affected initiative STATUS.md and CHUNK_MAP.md records

Files Outside Stated Scope

  • None

Product Behavior

  • No Workstream product behavior changed.

Evidence

Commands Run

python3 scripts/check_markdown_links.py
python3 scripts/check_stale_workstream_wording.py
python3 scripts/check_chunk_state_sync.py --base-ref origin/main
python3 -m unittest scripts.test_lightweight_agent_gates scripts.test_chunk_state_sync
git diff --check

Result Summary

14 changed Markdown files passed link validation.
Stale wording check passed.
Atomic chunk state check passed.
26 focused tests passed.
Diff check passed.

Acceptance Criteria Proof

Test Delta

Tests Added

  • None; documentation-only change.

Tests Modified

  • None.

Tests Removed Or Skipped

  • None.

Internal Reviewer Results

Reviewed code SHA: 33f4d77a

Reviewer Result Blocking Findings Notes
Docs PASS AFTER FIXES 0 Removed stale-prone PR #320 state from durable records
All other tracks N/A - with approved reason 0 Documentation/state-only; no product, architecture, CI, security, or test behavior changed

External Review

Source Status Notes
CodeRabbit Pending
GitHub checks Pending

CI And Gate Integrity

  • No workflow weakening.
  • No lint/test/docstring gate weakening.
  • No coverage threshold weakening.
  • No package script weakening.
  • No unpinned new GitHub Action.
  • Checkout credential persistence unchanged.

Remaining Risks

Historical contracts still contain retired terminology by design; the initiative index clearly classifies them as historical evidence.

Follow-Up Work

Triage old open PRs #62, #138, and #149 separately.

Human Review Focus

Please confirm that AUTH and POL-002 remaining boundaries stayed accurate while chronological process history was removed from live status pages.

Human Merge Ownership

  • Human maintainer review and explicit merge approval remain required.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated project status records to reflect recently completed architecture, database, CI, authorization, policy, and quality milestones.
    • Clarified current boundaries, dependencies, and next steps for ongoing initiatives.
    • Consolidated historical planning details into concise records of merged outcomes and remaining work.
    • Updated artifact and contribution records to reflect the current durable state.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request reconciles initiative ledgers and status documents with merged work. It records completed ARCH, DB, CI, and QUAL outcomes, updates durable-state wording, and replaces historical AUTH and POL planning instructions with current boundaries.

Changes

Initiative state reconciliation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Merged outcome records
.agent-loop/CURRENT_STATE.md, .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/*, .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-DB-001-v01-schema-baseline/*, .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-QUAL-002-behavior-ownership-catalogue/*
The records now identify merged ARCH, DB, and QUAL work and state the next bounded work areas.
Durable status normalization
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ART-001-immutable-artifact-storage/STATUS.md, .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-003-atomic-chunk-state/STATUS.md, .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CON-001-contribution-compensation-boundary/STATUS.md
The documents now use durable-state wording and record completed or merged initiative state.
POL governance boundaries
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-POL-002-post-submit-checker-foundation/*
POL-002 is recorded as historical and inactive. Superseded chunks and fresh-contract requirements are documented.
AUTH activation boundaries
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/*
AUTH records now describe concurrent bounded work, ordinary feature-gated contribution flow, merged AUTH-12I state, and POL-dependent activation limits.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: abiorh-claw

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the documentation change to reconcile initiative state.
Description check ✅ Passed The description follows the trust-bundle template and documents scope, rationale, evidence, risks, and review status.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/ws-docs-003-initiative-state-cleanup

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

…tiative-state-cleanup

# Conflicts:
#	.agent-loop/CURRENT_STATE.md
#	.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/CHUNK_MAP.md
#	.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/STATUS.md

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-DB-001-v01-schema-baseline/CHUNK_MAP.md:
- Line 5: Update the baseline gate text associated with WS-DB-001-01 in
CHUNK_MAP.md to describe the no-later-work constraint as a historical pre-merge
condition, using past tense and aligning with STATUS.md’s statement that product
work is not currently paused.
🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: b9be1b32-98e0-4c78-9553-34cf29830510

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29dbca7 and 17ba8f4.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • .agent-loop/CURRENT_STATE.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/CHUNK_MAP.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ARCH-001-modular-monolith-boundaries/STATUS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ART-001-immutable-artifact-storage/STATUS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/CHUNK_MAP.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/STATUS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CI-003-atomic-chunk-state/STATUS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-CON-001-contribution-compensation-boundary/STATUS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-DB-001-v01-schema-baseline/CHUNK_MAP.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-DB-001-v01-schema-baseline/STATUS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-POL-002-post-submit-checker-foundation/CHUNK_MAP.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-POL-002-post-submit-checker-foundation/STATUS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-QUAL-002-behavior-ownership-catalogue/CHUNK_MAP.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-QUAL-002-behavior-ownership-catalogue/STATUS.md

| Chunk | Purpose | Dependency | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| `WS-DB-001-01` | Replace the development migration chain with one exact v0.1 baseline and prove end-to-end parity | Planning approval and current `main` frozen as source head | Proposed |
| `WS-DB-001-01` | Replace the development migration chain with one exact v0.1 baseline and prove end-to-end parity | Planning approval and frozen source head | Merged PR #317 |

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Mark the baseline gate as historical.

Line 5 now records WS-DB-001-01 as merged, but the following text still says that no later product work begins until the baseline PR merges. This conflicts with .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-DB-001-v01-schema-baseline/STATUS.md Lines 3-10, which states that product work is not paused. Rewrite the gate in past tense or label it as a historical pre-merge constraint.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-DB-001-v01-schema-baseline/CHUNK_MAP.md at line
5, Update the baseline gate text associated with WS-DB-001-01 in CHUNK_MAP.md to
describe the no-later-work constraint as a historical pre-merge condition, using
past tense and aligning with STATUS.md’s statement that product work is not
currently paused.

@abiorh-claw
abiorh-claw self-requested a review August 11, 2026 22:13
@abiorh-claw
abiorh-claw merged commit ab7ce68 into main Aug 11, 2026
11 checks passed
@abiorh-claw
abiorh-claw deleted the codex/ws-docs-003-initiative-state-cleanup branch August 11, 2026 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants