Skip to content

docs(fr): translate GUID/authorization note for API1:2023 - #174

Open
musabustun wants to merge 1 commit into
OWASP:developfrom
musabustun:fix/fr-guid-authorization-note-158
Open

musabustun wants to merge 1 commit into
OWASP:developfrom
musabustun:fix/fr-guid-authorization-note-158

Conversation

@musabustun

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What

Closes #158. The note clarifying that GUIDs/UUIDs are not an authorization control (added in English as a translator placeholder — see #154/#155) was still untranslated in editions/2023/fr/0xa1-broken-object-level-authorization.md.

Translation

  • Kept the document's established terminology consistent with the rest of the file: "point d'accès (endpoint)" for endpoint, "utilisateur connecté" for the authenticated/logged-in user (both already used throughout this file).
  • Same note text, same placement (right after "Comment s'en prémunir", before "## Références") as the merged Italian translation (docs(it): translate GUIDs and authorization note for API1:2023 #172), which I used as a structural reference.

Testing

This is a two-paragraph prose translation with no code, links, or interpolation placeholders to validate — reviewed the diff against the English source and the merged Italian PR for parity.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The note clarifying that GUIDs/UUIDs are not an authorization control
(added in English as a translator placeholder, see OWASP#154/OWASP#155) was
still untranslated in the French edition of Broken Object Level
Authorization.

Translated both bullets, keeping the doc's established terminology
(point d'accès (endpoint), utilisateur connecté) consistent with the
rest of the file. Same note, same placement, as the merged Italian
translation (OWASP#172).

Closes OWASP#158

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@llegaz llegaz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants