Skip to content

gc/tests/support.rs: alloc_{nursery,old}_test_object(0) allocates ZERO inline slots — a named-property write lands in the next cell #10941

Description

@proggeramlug

Test-only, but it corrupts the heap silently and presents as a SIGSEGV somewhere unrelated. Found while building dictionary mode (PR #10938).

The bug

crates/perry-runtime/src/gc/tests/support.rs:869 (and its old-generation twin at :838):

let payload = std::mem::size_of::<crate::object::ObjectHeader>() + field_count as usize * 8;
let obj = crate::arena::arena_alloc_gc(payload, 8, GC_TYPE_OBJECT) as *mut ObjectHeader;

With field_count == 0 the allocation is exactly the header — no inline slots — and parent_class_id is deliberately left at 0 (unstamped), which the comment above it explains:

A zero-slot fixture needs no descriptor at all — the derived bound is 0 either way — and minting one would perturb the descriptor-count accounting that sibling tests assert on.

That is fine for what the fixture has been used for. Every existing caller only ever sets a [[Prototype]] on it. Nobody had written a named property to one.

A named-property write does not respect "the derived bound is 0". The inline/overflow boundary is

alloc_limit = max(object_live_slot_count(obj), INLINE_SLOT_FLOOR)   // floor is 2

so the first two keys store into inline slots 0 and 1 — of an object that has none. Those two words are the next cell.

Repro

let (owner, _) = unsafe { alloc_nursery_test_object(0) };
for i in 0..6 {
    let name = format!("k{i:02}");
    let key = crate::string::js_string_from_bytes(name.as_ptr(), name.len() as u32);
    crate::object::js_object_set_field_by_name(owner, key, i as f64);
}
// reads come back wrong; the next collection SIGSEGVs

It presented for me as a SIGSEGV inside a URLSearchParams shape probe reached from an ordinary by-name read — nowhere near the fixture.

Suggested fix

Either is fine; the point is that the failure should not be silent.

  1. Allocate max(field_count, INLINE_SLOT_FLOOR) slots, and keep publishing the bound as field_count so the descriptor-count accounting the comment protects is unchanged; or
  2. debug_assert! in the named-store path that the write is within the allocation, so the fixture fails loudly at the store rather than at an unrelated read; or
  3. document on the fixture that it is prototype-only and that a named write is UB — the cheapest, and it at least stops the next person.

Workaround in the meantime, used by test_object_meta_dictionary_keys_survive_copied_minor_move (PR #10938): pass a nonzero field_count.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugConfirmed defect or regression

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions