Skip to content

[bisect D] narrow the five regressions — DO NOT MERGE - #11077

Closed
proggeramlug wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
bisectD
Closed

proggeramlug wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
bisectD

Conversation

@proggeramlug

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BISECT PROBE — DO NOT MERGE. Quarter D of half B, which reproduced all five regressions from 8 PRs. Carries: 11022 11026 11028 11031

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@proggeramlug

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing — this was a throwaway bisect vehicle, not a change. It existed only because a pushed branch does not trigger CI in this repo; only a PR does. The bisect it belonged to has concluded.

Result of the bisect, so it is not lost with these PRs:

Also worth recording: I twice mis-attributed test_gap_numeric_push_guarded to #11035 during this hunt. That was wrong — #11035 is clean and landed in train 260. Isolating by CI on individual heads, rather than by reading diffs, is what corrected it.

Branch deleted.

@proggeramlug
proggeramlug deleted the bisectD branch September 23, 2026 08:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant