Hi,
i'm currently evaluating the kernel module with TCP hijacking against kernel version 7.0.0-31-generic (Ubuntu) on multiple NICs, other than the ones listed in the README and was wondering on what evidence you would like for adding NICs to the supported list? The NICs are Intel I219-V, Realtek RTL8111/8168/8211/8411, Intel I226-V, and Broadcom BCM57762, so consumer-grade 1 & 5 GbE. Would that still be of interest?
Also, I am not sure if my proof may be misleading, as I had to patch __cond_acquires (macro takes an additional argument in Linux 7), homa_bind (proto_ops.bind signature changed in Linux 7) and qdisc_from_priv (no longer in Linux 7) to get it working with the kernel version? Shall I file this as a separate issue?
Kind regards
Hi,
i'm currently evaluating the kernel module with TCP hijacking against kernel version 7.0.0-31-generic (Ubuntu) on multiple NICs, other than the ones listed in the README and was wondering on what evidence you would like for adding NICs to the supported list? The NICs are Intel I219-V, Realtek RTL8111/8168/8211/8411, Intel I226-V, and Broadcom BCM57762, so consumer-grade 1 & 5 GbE. Would that still be of interest?
Also, I am not sure if my proof may be misleading, as I had to patch
__cond_acquires(macro takes an additional argument in Linux 7),homa_bind(proto_ops.bindsignature changed in Linux 7) andqdisc_from_priv(no longer in Linux 7) to get it working with the kernel version? Shall I file this as a separate issue?Kind regards