Repository navigation
Conversation
- Switch on the senior and disabled medically needy flags for AR, IA, IL, NJ and ND. - Add medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit, which applies a share of the poverty guideline (IL, MN, ND, NY, UT, WI) or of the SSI federal benefit rate (KS, WA) in place of a dollar limit; Washington applies its one-person limit to couples. - Update dollar limits in CT, DC, NH, RI and NY (2022), and asset limits in CA, IL and NY. Closes PolicyEngine#10357 Closes PolicyEngine#10358 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 21, 2026
Use the SSI rate as the Medicaid aged/disabled income limit in West Virginia and North Dakota
#10373
Open
…rences - Year-keyed cases pin every dated CT, DC, NH, RI, NY, MN, ND and WI income limit; cases sit exactly at the IL, ND, CA and NY limits, with CA one dollar over, CA 2024 without a limit, and couples at the NY, CA and IL couple asset limits. - NJ and CA cases use incomes above the optional ABD pathway. - Disabled adults in AR, IA, IL, ND and NJ are in a medically needy category. - Arkansas spend down in cents (108.33 / 216.66, DHS quick reference). - Fix NY GIS 22 MA/11 and RI 210-RICR-40-00-3 titles, the RI section, the KS F-8 page; cite 305 ILCS 5/5-2 and Welf. & Inst. Code 14005.62. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Open
3 of 4 tasks
The PIL outside Chittenden County, the same for one and two people, each January 1 (HBEE 8.06(b), 29.14; DCF B17-26; DVHA charts 2020-2026). No 2019 PIL was found, so 2018's value stays in force through 2019. The higher Chittenden PIL is not modeled. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 27, 2026
KFF 2018 and 2026 list no medically needy program for aged, blind or disabled people in these five states; the flags had been swapped with AR, IL, IA, NJ and ND. Their -inf limits meant no result changes. The NJ DMAHS fact sheet now 404s, so cite the 2026-05-14 Wayback copy. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6 tasks
- Iowa 441-75.8(7) and (5)"a", the NJ fact sheet (archived) and SPA KS-25-0019 page 7 for the $475 standard, alongside KFF. - HBEE 29.14 cited from file page 50. - Number the two category cases 3 and 4, after PR 10370's Cases 1-2. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #10357
Closes #10358
What and why
PolicyEngine's medically needy pathway for aged, blind and disabled people (
is_medically_needy_for_medicaid) had two problems. Five states that run the pathway had it switched off, and most limits still held 2018 values. This PR switches the five states on and updates the limits in 14 states. Where a state ties its limit to the poverty guideline or the SSI federal benefit rate, the PR encodes that rate in place of a dollar amount.Pathway switched on (senior and disabled flags)
Pathway switched off (senior and disabled flags)
AZ, ID, IN, NM and NV had the senior and disabled flags on, swapped with AR, IL, IA, NJ and ND. KFF's 2018 and 2026 tables, already cited in the flag files, list no medically needy program for aged, blind or disabled people in these five states. They are now off from 2015. Their limits were
-.inf, so no result changes.Limits tied to a federal amount
Dollar limits updated
Asset limits updated
How the model applies them
medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit(person, annual). It returns one of three amounts:fpg_ratetimes the poverty guideline for one or two people, when the state'sfpg_rateis above zero;ssi_ratetimes the SSI federal benefit rate (individual or couple rate), when the state'sssi_rateis above zero;medicaid_optional_senior_or_disabled_income_limit(42 CFR 435.602).is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.py, so the Python merges cleanly. Both PRs, and Count income of aged, blind, or disabled people who fail SSI's noncitizen test #10240, append cases tois_medically_needy_for_medicaid.yaml, and Count blind people and use the individual or couple in the Medicaid medically needy test #10370 also appends tois_in_medicaid_medically_needy_category.yaml.is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.yamlas two interleaved conflict blocks, and "Accept Both" splices the blocks mid-case, which gives invalid YAML. Instead, take Count blind people and use the individual or couple in the Medicaid medically needy test #10370's version of the file whole (its MA case and Cases 1-6), then append this PR's Cases 3-15 in their original order, renumbered 7-19.is_in_medicaid_medically_needy_category.yaml, keep Count blind people and use the individual or couple in the Medicaid medically needy test #10370's Cases 1-2, then this PR's Cases 3-4, which are already numbered to follow them.limit.income.fpg_rate(IL, MN, ND, NY, UT, WI) andlimit.income.ssi_rate(KS, WA). These files list only the states that use them. NY, WI and KS carry a zero share before their switch dates.limit.income.couple_uses_individual_limit, true for Washington only. Washington's MNIL chart gives the one-person benefit rate to households of one and two people. Kansas's F-8 table gives couples the couple rate.Not confirmed against a primary source
DC: DHCF publishes only the one-person level ($780.58 for 2023 and $809.08 for 2024). The couple levels and the 2025–2026 values follow the method in 29 DCMR 901.1 and its table: the two-person level is 50% of the two-person guideline, and the one-person level is 95% of that. This method reproduces both DHCF figures and KFF's 2026 figures, which KFF rounds to $857 / $902. Sources give values by year only, so the parameter dates them January 1.
ND: no North Dakota document says when 90% replaced 83%. The manual shows 83% in April 2023 and 90% in April 2024. SPA ND-23-0034 (effective 2024-01-01) aligns the medically needy standards at 90%. Manual letter 3776 (1/1/2024) and the table in ML 3790 point to the same date, so the parameter uses 2024-01-01.
NH: KFF 2026 lists $926 / $1,073. The CMS-approved SPA NH-25-0019 and NH's current manual tables show $939 / $1,093 from 2025-07-01, and the PR uses those.
VT 2019: no 2019 PIL was found (DVHA's 2019 chart is not online or archived), so 2018's $1,041 stays in force through 2019.
IL: IDHS does not state when it applies each year's new guideline. Illinois's Department on Aging says the figures post in early April.
DC state plan: CMS-approved SPA DC-22-0014 (effective 10/1/2022, pp. 15–17) still lists the 1994 six-month levels, $2,262 / $2,382, or $377 / $397 a month. The PR follows 29 DCMR 901.1 and DHCF's notices. No statute is involved.
Limitations
Out of scope
parent.yamlhas more differences. Follow-up issue Medicaid medically needy: fix the pregnant, child and parent category flags against KFF and state sources #10473.Test plan
medicaid_medically_needy_income_limit.yaml(18 cases, including Vermont's PIL for every year from 2018 to 2026):is_medically_needy_for_medicaid.yaml:is_in_medicaid_medically_needy_category.yaml: disabled adults in AR, IA, IL, ND and NJ are in a medically needy category; a senior and a disabled adult in AZ are not.medicaid_medically_needy_medical_expenses.yaml. Under the 2026 limit ($11,928) the old income passed both ways. The case now uses countable income of $15,000, so it still distinguishes deducting pretax premiums once from deducting them twice.make format(ruff)changelog.d/No file in
tests/policy/baseline/partners/changes. By static reading, the partner Medicaid cases in these states are seniors who already qualify through the aged, blind and disabled pathway, and the medically needy pathway applies only to people outside every other pathway. CI will confirm once the PR is ready.axiom: TheAxiomFoundation/rulespec-us#1938 queued
🤖 Generated with Claude Code