fix: client authentication

[pbrassel]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Added support for configuring client authentication methods and token binding when creating or updating clients.
  • Client details now display the selected authentication and token-binding settings.

• Bug Fixes

  • Client authentication flow validation now runs as a standard test.

• Documentation

  • Updated the code coverage badge from 97% to 98%.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0f537ccf-074b-40c0-99be-4e8d34004449

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2e3fd2 and 983938b.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• README.md
• flame_hub/_auth_client.py
• tests/test_flow.py

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• tests/test_flow.py

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Client authorization and token binding methods are added to client models and AuthClient create/update APIs. The client authentication flow test is enabled, and the README coverage badge is updated.

Changes

Client authorization methods

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Authorization model contracts flame_hub/_auth_client.py	Defines literal types for authentication and token binding methods and adds them to create, client, and update models.
Authorization API propagation flame_hub/_auth_client.py, tests/test_flow.py, README.md	Extends client creation and update signatures and payloads, enables the client authentication test, and updates the coverage badge.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• PrivateAIM/hub-python-client#117: Modifies the same client model and API fields with camelCase naming changes.
• PrivateAIM/hub-python-client#123: Modifies the same AuthClient create/update signatures and request wiring.
• PrivateAIM/hub-python-client#124: Modifies the same client models and their shared Pydantic base configuration.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title is concise and accurately reflects the main change to client authentication behavior.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/client-auth

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}