Skip to content

FOUR-32501 Octane MEDIUM - Accumulating State ProcessMakerServiceProvider - #8968

Open
devmiguelangel wants to merge 4 commits into
feature/FOUR-32464from
FOUR-32501
Open

FOUR-32501 Octane MEDIUM - Accumulating State ProcessMakerServiceProvider#8968
devmiguelangel wants to merge 4 commits into
feature/FOUR-32464from
FOUR-32501

Conversation

@devmiguelangel

@devmiguelangel devmiguelangel commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Octane MEDIUM - Accumulating State ProcessMakerServiceProvider

Solution

  • Refactors server boot timing into a worker-scoped WorkerBootTimingService, removing mutable static boot/package state while preserving per-request query timing and dynamic configuration reads.

Related Tickets & Packages

FOUR-32501

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@devmiguelangel
devmiguelangel marked this pull request as draft August 3, 2026 20:26
@processmaker-sonarqube

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

@devmiguelangel
devmiguelangel marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2026 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant