🧪 Add test for interpreter uncaught throw bubbling - #34
Conversation
This adds a test case to explicitly verify the error bubbling path for a throw statement that is executed without an enclosing try-catch block in the AST. This satisfies the testing requirement in interpreter_tests.rs for uncaught throws. Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
🎯 What: The testing gap addressed was an untested error path in the interpret loop for uncaught throws, where
FlowSignal::Throwbubbles up throughexecute_blockandexecute_statementall the way toInterpreter::interpret.📊 Coverage: The test
test_interpreter_uncaught_throwexplicitly evaluates a script containing a throw statement (throw "uncaught exception") without a try-catch, checking the expected runtime error struct (RuntimeErrorwithRuntimeErrorKind::UserError).✨ Result: Increased unit test coverage in
techscript_interpreter, successfully confirming proper propagation of user exceptions out of the main evaluation loop.PR created automatically by Jules for task 14980811631704032051 started by @Tcode-Motion