Skip to content

🧹 Replace unsafe LLVM unreachable with explicit compiler error for Throw - #46

Merged
Tcode-Motion merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-llvm-exception-handling-7317866299840611937
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

🧹 Replace unsafe LLVM unreachable with explicit compiler error for Throw#46
Tcode-Motion merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-llvm-exception-handling-7317866299840611937

Conversation

@Tcode-Motion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What: Modified the Throw terminator arm in codegen.rs to return a Rust Err instead of emitting LLVMBuildUnreachable.

💡 Why: Emitting unreachable in LLVM for valid code paths is a bad practice that leads to undefined behavior at runtime if the path is ever taken. Returning a compilation error fails gracefully and clearly communicates that the feature is unsupported, improving compiler maintainability and user safety.

Verification: Verified the fix by running cargo check -p techscript_llvm_backend and the full test suite (cargo test --workspace), which passed without regressions.

Result: Unimplemented exception handling now reliably results in a safe compile-time error rather than unpredictable runtime crashes.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 7317866299840611937 started by @Tcode-Motion

…hrow terminator

The LLVM backend was previously generating an `unreachable` LLVM instruction for the `Throw` IR terminator, as full exception handling is not yet implemented. This led to unsafe execution and undefined behavior if triggered.

This change modifies `codegen.rs` to return a clear Rust `Err` during compile time if an exception construct is encountered, causing compilation to gracefully fail instead of producing a potentially dangerous and undefined binary.

Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@Tcode-Motion
Tcode-Motion marked this pull request as ready for review August 25, 2026 09:56
@Tcode-Motion
Tcode-Motion merged commit 6d9d5bd into main Aug 25, 2026
3 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant