🧪 [testing improvement] Add test for word module registration - #66
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: This PR adds a missing test for the module registration logic of the
std.wordmodule (stdlib/src/word.rs).📊 Coverage: The new
test_word_moduletest verifies the initialization state ofstd.word, specifically confirming its name, version (1.0.0), empty exports, and lack of required capabilities when registered viaStdlibRegistry.✨ Result: Test coverage for
stdlib/src/word.rsmodule registration is established, ensuring that future changes tostd.word's registration behavior will be caught if they deviate from expected initialization defaults.PR created automatically by Jules for task 7583767144607627607 started by @Tcode-Motion