Move Wasmi next to Wasm3 + update entries - #562
Merged
Conversation
wasmi and wasm3 are direct competitors and thus it is useful to readers of the website to have them be adjacent to each other for comparison. back when I added Wasmi to the list I appended it to the back. given that other new additions didn't do that I wonder if there actually is an ordering? maybe it would be good to have one since with the current visualization it is kind of bad to land on the spots at the end since they are only visible when scrolling. an even better solution is likely to introduce a different visualization that makes scrolling unnecessary and equals all spots.
Robbepop
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reason: Wasmi and Wasm3 are friendly competitors and thus it is useful to readers of the website to have them be adjacent to each other for comparison.
The Problem
Back when I added Wasmi to the list I politely appended it to the back.
However, I noticed that not all new additions do that.
The issue is that the last spots are inferior to the first due to the visualization of the table on the website.
Users have to scroll to see the last spots and therefore nobody wants to take those places.
This visualization worked until a certain threshold of entries existed.
How could we make this visualization fairer for now and future additions?
Some Proposals