-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
fix: Validate filter selectivity at SET time
#24541
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
subhramit
wants to merge
6
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
subhramit:validate-default-filter-selectivity
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+212
−15
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1ce16e6
fix: Validate filter selectivity at SET time
subhramit f729bc2
test: Fix `sqllogictest` record separation
subhramit eaa135f
Merge branch 'main' into validate-default-filter-selectivity
subhramit f6314d1
Update datafusion/common/src/config.rs
subhramit 060041c
refactor: Generalize usize config validation
subhramit ec1921e
Merge branch 'main' into validate-default-filter-selectivity
subhramit File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we have any other configs that could benefit from this? that way we might rename this to something more generic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably we can generalize it to a
And several existing typed config structs can reuse this one (like
ConfigNonZeroUsize)But I think this is not blocking, we can clean it up in a follow-up PR
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I took the opportunity and refactored in this PR itself in 060041c (also added a
valuefield since we need to store the configured value as well). Have reused it in both existing typedusizewrappers (ConfigNonZeroUsizeandConfigMinTwoUsize).Since
ConfigFilterSelectivityisu8, I did not reuse it here, as that would require widening tousizeand narrowing back tou8.See if this is what we are looking for.