Skip to content

Best image formats for websites in 2026: A complete guide#3097

Open
aishwaripahwa12 wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
best-image-formats-for-websites-a-complete-guide
Open

Best image formats for websites in 2026: A complete guide#3097
aishwaripahwa12 wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
best-image-formats-for-websites-a-complete-guide

Conversation

@aishwaripahwa12

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Latest SEO blog

@appwrite

appwrite Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Appwrite Website

Project ID: 69d7efb00023389e8d27

Sites (1)
Site Status Logs Preview QR
 website
69d7f2670014e24571ca
Ready Ready View Logs Preview URL QR Code

Website (appwrite/website)

Project ID: 684969cb000a2f6c0a02

Sites (1)
Site Status Logs Preview QR
 website
68496a17000f03d62013
Queued Queued View Logs Preview URL QR Code


Tip

Silent mode disables those chatty PR comments if you prefer peace and quiet

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR adds a new SEO blog post, "Best image formats for websites in 2026," along with its cover image and a corresponding .optimize-cache.json entry. The post is currently marked unlisted: true.

  • The Markdoc file introduces a complete guide covering AVIF, WebP, JPEG, PNG, SVG, and GIF — including a comparison table, decision guide, <picture> fallback code example, and an Appwrite Storage CTA.
  • The <picture> HTML code block and surrounding formatting issues flagged in the previous review appear to have been corrected.
  • A duplicate explanatory paragraph appears back-to-back after the code example (the same "the browser uses the first format it understands" content is written twice with only minor wording variation).

Confidence Score: 4/5

Safe to publish once the duplicated paragraph is removed; no structural or rendering breakage otherwise.

The post has one real content defect: the explanatory paragraph immediately after the code block is written twice, back-to-back, with only minor wording differences. Leaving both in the published article looks unpolished and sends a duplicate-content signal to search crawlers — the opposite of the SEO goal this post is meant to serve. Everything else — the code block, table, FAQ, and frontmatter — looks correct.

src/routes/blog/post/best-image-formats-for-websites-in-2026-a-complete-guide/+page.markdoc — remove one of the two duplicate paragraphs after the code example before publishing.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
src/routes/blog/post/best-image-formats-for-websites-in-2026-a-complete-guide/+page.markdoc New SEO blog post on image formats; the HTML code block and formatting issues from the previous review appear resolved, but an identical explanatory paragraph appears twice back-to-back after the code example.
.optimize-cache.json Adds cache entry for the new blog post cover image; extension mismatch (cache references .png, committed file is .avif) is intentional per project convention.

Reviews (5): Last reviewed commit: "Update +page.markdoc" | Re-trigger Greptile

Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant