Skip to content

docs: record omitted old-build parity decisions - #14

Merged
bryanwieg merged 1 commit into
rx9070-portfrom
docs/old-build-parity-reference
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

bryanwieg merged 1 commit into
rx9070-portfrom
docs/old-build-parity-reference

Conversation

@bryanwieg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds docs/agents/historical-working-build-parity.md as a durable reference for future migration work.

The document records meaningful behavior-changing commits from the previous ROCmFPX-derived working lineage that are intentionally absent from the current fork, including:

  • commit SHA and historical behavior
  • classification: superseded, retest, configure, optional, reference-only, or separate feature
  • why the commit was left out
  • what future condition would make it relevant again
  • ROCmFP4 investigation policy
  • practical old-build behavior-parity checklist
  • rules for revisiting historical donor work

It also updates optimization-history.md to link the decision log and correct the status of the old direct-write GDN fusion: current llama.cpp now contains native GDN cache-write fusion, so the historical WIP commit is treated as superseded rather than pending.

Add a living parity reference for behavior-changing commits that existed in
the previous ROCmFPX-derived working branch but were intentionally not carried
into the current fork.

For each historical commit, record its old behavior, current classification,
why it is omitted, and the condition that would justify revisiting it. Cover
superseded speculative/cache and GDN work, optional compatibility features,
retest-only HIP/vision issues, configuration replacements, diagnostics, and
the ROCmFP4 investigation policy.

Update optimization-history to point at the new decision log and reflect that
the historical direct-write GDN fusion is now superseded by current llama.cpp
rather than a pending port candidate.
@bryanwieg
bryanwieg merged commit 2c2da1f into rx9070-port Sep 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant