-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
ci: remove the Podman checkpoint/restore job #123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+0
−83
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[MEDIUM] [R8] Removing the only live Podman gate leaves checkpoint/restore regressions invisible to CI
git show 29ce1d948b03c493b59b9811bb1d34059b0989c7:design/podman-backend.md | nl -ba | grep -i -A6 -B4 -E 'integration|test' | head -100\nRaw output:281\t### Phase 2 — the Podman backend...288\t- Integration tests behind a real-podman gate (mirror the existing/289\t real-docker compose integration-test gate).and318\t- **Integration (real podman gate):** bring a container up via the Podman/319\t backend, checkpoint→remove→restore, assert memory + networking resume/320\t — the bench test, codified.\n\nThe deleted job was the only CI path that compiled and ran the live tests (go test -c ./runtime/podman, then/w/podman.test -test.run TestIntegrationand/w/int.test -test.run '^TestPodman'). The remaining workflow only runsgo test -tags=integration ./test/integration/...against Docker and does not setPODMAN_SOCKET; the Podman tests explicitly callt.Skipwhen that variable is absent (runtime/podman/integration_test.go:27-30,test/integration/podman_checkpoint_restore_test.go:36-38). Thus a broken libpod checkpoint/restore or build endpoint can pass every remaining check, directly contradicting the backend design's required real-Podman gate.runtime/podman/integration_test.go:27-30andtest/integration/podman_checkpoint_restore_test.go:36-38readPODMAN_SOCKETand skip without it;.github/workflows/ci.yml:74-86runs the remaining integration suite without providing that socket, so no remaining CI consumer exercises the Podman backend against a daemon.PODMAN_SOCKET, and runs the runtime-level and engine/project checkpoint tests. If intentionally abandoning this guarantee, updatedesign/podman-backend.mdand the backend's support/validation contract rather than silently deleting the gate.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dismissed — the reviewer retracted this finding.
Reason: After re-reading the repository standard and its cited evidence, I no longer stand behind this as a defect in this PR. The factual coverage loss remains real, but R8 explicitly allows a backend-specific path to be untested when the change makes an explicit statement of which backend is untested; the PR description does exactly that. The referenced podman-backend design is marked “Draft for review,” and design/README.md:10-15 says such records are not kept in sync and that code is authoritative, so my original “required gate/design contradiction” framing was not valid. The preceding #121/#122 removal sequence also establishes that this retirement work intentionally removes backend coverage without rewriting design records. The deleted job was best-effort (it intentionally exited green when CRIU was unavailable), and no evidence shows a current supported Podman consumer that this CI deletion breaks.
The review comment above records what was claimed at the time, and is left unedited.