Skip to content

fix(flow): preserve supplied assurance limitations in handoffs - #179

Merged
vriesd merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
fix/handoff-disclosure-contract
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

vriesd merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
fix/handoff-disclosure-contract

Conversation

@vriesd

@vriesd vriesd commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A live handoff omitted goal-alignment and evidence-completeness limitations. The grader separately rejected the equivalent freshness wording “the archive” in place of “an archive”.

All three manager handoff skills now require copying each supplied limitation statement unchanged, including its full topic list. Concise summaries and full reports on request remain supported. The grader accepts the bounded article variation and continues rejecting missing topics, contradictory claims and unsupported tails.

Validation passed 2,839 tests with 20 existing skips and zero failures, followed by 78 path-selected tests. Independent exact-head review returned PASS+NOTES at f25987c and inspected all five files and the actual packed instructions. All nine historical reports remain unchanged. Their 340 earlier gradable inputs pass, the host failure stays excluded, and the newest input still fails for its real omission.

These checks establish the local repair. Package bytes changed. No paid call used this package. A fresh complete canonical qualification and its canary remain required.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-07T21:11:31.195224Z bc5eabf PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@vriesd

vriesd commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Independent source-author-distinct review returned PASS+NOTES for head bc5eabf against base 970facd. Stable patch ID is fdc9b0b9769e23d952e6d742dd0dce94ec724b5f.

The reviewer built and inspected the actual packed guidance. The instruction copies only the supplied limitation statements unchanged and preserves the concise default/full-report-on-request contract. Static delivery is not a guarantee of model adherence.

The original native answer still fails for its genuine missing topics. The semantically equivalent article no longer adds a false freshness error. Independent disclosure and native Goal/closure/review/authority contradiction controls passed. All nine original report hashes remain unchanged. Earlier340gradable inputs pass; newest genuine omission and original host exclusion remain recorded.

Parent full contribution preflight passed 2,837 tests with20existing skips and zero failures; focused verification passed675tests. Independent exact Comment Sicko audit has zero findings with all file hashes matched.

Package bytes changed. Prior same-artifact paid authorization does not cover the new package. No paid call or fresh qualification pass is claimed by this repair.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bc5eabf92b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread skills/flow-run/SKILL.md
@vriesd

vriesd commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Independent source-author-distinct verdict PASS+NOTES for exact head f25987c against base970facd57f5d4e824cc8cdbcaab7fe3977f80c9d. Stable patch8047243e870b1dea8d4ad235af0581ab4a05d8f2. This supersedes the earlier three-file review.

All five files reviewed. Actual built and packed flow, flow-plan and flow-run instructions preserve each supplied limitation unchanged while retaining summaries and optional full reports. Packed SHAec955730c97a7abadf37d6b0021ee2e39dba5999603f6c13e49d23080d71663f. Independent 88 focused tests, 20 disclosure controls and four native contradiction controls passed. The real latest topic omission remains rejected; all nine original report hashes remain unchanged. No paid calls used the changed artifact.

Parent full preflight passed 2,839 tests, 20 existing skips and zero failures, followed by78 path-selected tests. Read-only comment audit found zero introduced comments or suppressions across the five-file patch.

The source repair is verified locally. Fresh canonical qualification and its canary are still required for release. Changed package bytes need a paid artifact decision before dispatch.

@vriesd
vriesd merged commit eb7d953 into main Oct 7, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants