Skip to content

Document supported OpenGL ES IGL10 methods - #416

Open
jonathanpeppers wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jonathanpeppers-document-khronos-gles
Open

Document supported OpenGL ES IGL10 methods#416
jonathanpeppers wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
jonathanpeppers-document-khronos-gles

Conversation

@jonathanpeppers

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Document five IGL10 methods: GlActiveTexture, GlBindTexture, GlClear, GlDrawArrays, and GlViewport.
  • Add parameter details and direct Khronos reference links for each documented method.

Sources

Validation

  • Parsed docs/xml/Javax.Microedition.Khronos.Opengles/IGL10.xml with PowerShell XML parsing.
  • Confirmed CRLF-only line endings.
  • Ran git diff --check.
  • Verified each of the five changed member documentation blocks contains neither placeholders nor an empty summary.

Refs #281

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR improves the generated API documentation for Javax.Microedition.Khronos.Opengles.IGL10 by replacing placeholder XML docs with concrete summaries/parameter descriptions and adding authoritative Khronos reference links, aligning this namespace with the broader effort tracked in #281.

Changes:

  • Filled in <summary> and <param> documentation for five IGL10 methods (GlActiveTexture, GlBindTexture, GlClear, GlDrawArrays, GlViewport).
  • Added direct Khronos OpenGL ES 1.1 reference links in <remarks> for each of those methods.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread docs/xml/Javax.Microedition.Khronos.Opengles/IGL10.xml Outdated
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@jonathanpeppers

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@dalexsoto The inline review feedback has been corrected in d22f153; the resolved thread documents the change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants