Skip to content

Make builder tracing work and switchable at runtime - #2802

Open
vogella wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-platform:masterfrom
vogella:per-builder-build-events
Open

Make builder tracing work and switchable at runtime#2802
vogella wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-platform:masterfrom
vogella:per-builder-build-events

Conversation

@vogella

@vogella vogella commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replaces the earlier PRE_PROJECT_BUILD/POST_PROJECT_BUILD proposal with the tracing approach suggested by @iloveeclipse and @merks, so no new API is needed.

Per-builder tracing already existed as org.eclipse.core.resources/perf/builders, blaming the builder and using the project as context, but it never worked: ResourceStats kept the in-progress PerformanceStats in a single static field, so under parallel builds two builders overwrote each other's start time and any notification triggered from inside a builder dropped that builder's timing completely. PerformanceStats.startRun(context) also mutates the context of the shared stats instance, and since context is part of its hashCode that corrupted the key of an object already in the global stats map, so per-builder totals never aggregated. Each start now returns a handle that the matching end consumes, and the elapsed time is recorded through addRun, which leaves the shared context alone.

The second half is that tracing enablement was frozen at startup, which made it useless for tooling. PerformanceStats.ENABLED is now kept in sync with the debug options by a listener in core.runtime, and the resources trace flags are refreshed from the listener core.resources already had, so tracing can be switched on without a restart. Note that a bundle is only notified about its own options, so the resources flags track only its own perf/* entries and consult the global flag separately; that is also what makes disabling and re-enabling work. The threshold is now the shortest duration still reported, so 0 means "every occurrence", and for builders a threshold of 0 gathers statistics without writing anything to the log.

With this in place the existing "Event Spy" view in org.eclipse.core.tools already shows correct per-builder and per-project build times, since it reads PerformanceStats.getAllStats(). A dedicated Build Monitor view is planned for org.eclipse.ui.monitoring in eclipse.platform.ui, which turns builder tracing on while the view is open and restores the previous debug options when it closes; that needs this change first, so it will be a follow-up PR there.

BuilderTracingTest covers the runtime toggle, the per-builder and per-project attribution, and the listener notification, none of which was testable before enablement became dynamic.

Removing final from PerformanceStats.ENABLED reports 0 API errors with -Papi-check, but it does change the documented promise that enablement cannot change during the life of the platform, so that part deserves a look.

Bundle-Name: %pluginName
Bundle-SymbolicName: org.eclipse.core.resources; singleton:=true
Bundle-Version: 3.24.100.qualifier
Bundle-Version: 3.25.100.qualifier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bump seem to be wrong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New API, hence the bump.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The bump shouldn't include service segment!

@merks merks Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The point is that a bump of the minor version sets the service version back to zero so it should be 3.25.0 not 3.25.100

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think in the past we had the rule to use 100 in the end to allow downports. Is that obsolete? https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform/blob/master/docs/VersionNumbering.md#when-to-change-the-service-segment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Forget this comment, this is for the first change of the third segment. Not the other one, so 3.25.0 would be correct.

I leave this as it is for now as we anyhow want tracing and not new API.

@vogella
vogella force-pushed the per-builder-build-events branch from dd12d64 to 05a9001 Compare July 6, 2026 10:35
@iloveeclipse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Have you considered providing tracing information instead? For the reasons mentioned in #2801 it should be sufficient. There is also "Event view" in runtime thac can be extended for that, or just create something similar based on that.

My main concern with the proposal here is that except for occasional performance checks it is not needed (it wasn't obviously requested by anyone since 20 years of resources API), however it will always generate lot more events (per builder & per project).

@vogella

vogella commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks @iloveeclipse for the suggestion I look into tracing as an alternative.

This might take a bit longer, as I soon will vanish into summer vacation and because I use this in a similar version already since a while in my custom aggregator build so my personal pressure is not that high to rework that approach.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test Results

    54 files  ±0      54 suites  ±0   55m 37s ⏱️ - 1m 18s
 4 769 tests +3   4 747 ✅ +3   22 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
12 198 runs  +9  12 045 ✅ +9  153 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit d6ae001. ± Comparison against base commit 241fa27.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@vogella vogella changed the title Add per-builder build events to IResourceChangeEvent WIP - Add per-builder build events to IResourceChangeEvent Jul 7, 2026
@vogella
vogella force-pushed the per-builder-build-events branch from 05a9001 to 582ebd6 Compare July 30, 2026 11:42
@vogella vogella changed the title WIP - Add per-builder build events to IResourceChangeEvent Fix per-builder performance tracing and report slow builders Jul 30, 2026
@vogella
vogella force-pushed the per-builder-build-events branch from 582ebd6 to f12accc Compare July 30, 2026 12:40
@vogella vogella changed the title Fix per-builder performance tracing and report slow builders Make builder tracing work and switchable at runtime Jul 30, 2026
@vogella
vogella force-pushed the per-builder-build-events branch from f12accc to 3f478b7 Compare July 30, 2026 16:41
@vogella

vogella commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Implemented the suggestions from @merks and @iloveeclipse

Please check again.

@iloveeclipse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Please check again.

Please wait till next week, I'm getting old and need some rest on weekends :-)

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes incorrect and incomplete performance tracing for workspace builders under parallel execution, and enables toggling tracing at runtime via DebugOptions (instead of being frozen at startup). It updates org.eclipse.core.runtime to keep PerformanceStats.ENABLED in sync with debug options, and updates org.eclipse.core.resources to use per-run handles so start/end timing is thread-safe and correctly attributed to builder + project context.

Changes:

  • Make PerformanceStats.ENABLED runtime-switchable and rework threshold/success-tracing evaluation to reflect current debug options.
  • Replace ResourceStats’ single shared “current” stats with per-run Run handles to avoid cross-thread overwrites and context/hash corruption.
  • Add BuilderTracingTest coverage and wire it into the resources builder test suite.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 12 out of 12 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
runtime/bundles/org.eclipse.core.runtime/src/org/eclipse/core/runtime/PerformanceStats.java Makes tracing enablement dynamic; adjusts threshold handling and listener registration behavior.
runtime/bundles/org.eclipse.core.runtime/src/org/eclipse/core/internal/runtime/InternalPlatform.java Registers a DebugOptionsListener to refresh runtime debug flags and keep PerformanceStats.ENABLED synchronized.
resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.resources/src/org/eclipse/core/internal/events/ResourceStats.java Introduces per-run Run handle model; adds dynamic option refresh and per-event tracing predicates.
resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.resources/src/org/eclipse/core/internal/events/BuildManager.java Uses Run handles for builder timing; adds threshold-based logging behavior for builder debug/trace.
resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.resources/src/org/eclipse/core/internal/events/NotificationManager.java Switches listener timing to Run handles and dynamic isTracingListeners() checks.
resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.resources/src/org/eclipse/core/internal/resources/SaveManager.java Wraps save participant and snapshot timing in Run handles for correct pairing.
resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.resources/src/org/eclipse/core/internal/localstore/FileSystemResourceManager.java Migrates refresh timing to Run handles and uses returned duration for conditional logging.
resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.resources/src/org/eclipse/core/internal/utils/Policy.java Triggers ResourceStats.optionsChanged() on debug option changes so resources tracing can be toggled at runtime.
resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.resources/.options Documents new builder-threshold semantics (including “0 gathers stats without logging”).
resources/tests/org.eclipse.core.tests.resources/src/org/eclipse/core/tests/internal/builders/BuilderTracingTest.java New test validating runtime toggling, attribution, and listener notification.
resources/tests/org.eclipse.core.tests.resources/src/org/eclipse/core/tests/internal/builders/AllBuilderTests.java Adds BuilderTracingTest to the builder test suite.
resources/tests/org.eclipse.core.tests.resources/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF Adds debug options package import needed by the new test.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@vogella
vogella marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2026 09:06
@vogella
vogella marked this pull request as draft September 2, 2026 09:07
@vogella
vogella force-pushed the per-builder-build-events branch 3 times, most recently from 86652c1 to f2f88e7 Compare September 2, 2026 09:20
@vogella
vogella marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2026 09:20
@vogella

vogella commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Please check again.

Please wait till next week, I'm getting old and need some rest on weekends :-)

Its been now a month. :-) Any new feedback?

It is based on tracing as requested by you and @merks The tracing can be turned on and off at runtime. No additional event.

@iloveeclipse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The tracing can be turned on and off at runtime.

Please provide steps to validate the PR. Which options need to be set? org.eclipse.core.resources/perf/builders=0 or more / other option or value?

@iloveeclipse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

At least for me I see builders info appearing in only after setting these tracing options:

org.eclipse.core.runtime/perf=true
org.eclipse.core.runtime/perf/success=true

org.eclipse.core.resources/perf/builders=0

Please confirm that this is the right way to validate.
This is what I see
image

legacyPreferencesService = context.registerService(ILegacyPreferences.class, new InitLegacyPreferences(), new Hashtable<>());

Hashtable<String, String> debugProperties = new Hashtable<>(2);
debugProperties.put(DebugOptions.LISTENER_SYMBOLICNAME, Platform.PI_RUNTIME);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I miss contribution to the extension point so that users can enable runtime performance tracing at runtime, something like this:

<extension
         point="org.eclipse.ui.trace.traceComponents">
      <component
            id="org.eclipse.core.runtime.traceComponent" label="%traceComponentName">
            <bundle name="org.eclipse.core.runtime" />
      </component>
   </extension>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Components can disable/ activate it via:

	private void disableTracing() {
		ServiceCaller.callOnce(getClass(), DebugOptions.class, options -> {
			if (!debugWasEnabled) {
				// disabling debug discards all options, including the ones set above
				options.setDebugEnabled(false);
				return;
			}
			replacedOptions.forEach((option, value) -> {
				if (value == null) {
					options.removeOption(option);
				} else {
					options.setOption(option, value);
				}
			});
		});
	}

Enable see here https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform/pull/2896/changes#diff-a6abe37830234d56ff13e2c61b8e7f026fd3ddc40adaa29bbba2e44e79471c2eR111

No need for plugin.xml.

The above coding is copied from my example view #2896

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Components can disable/ activate it via:

I'm talking about enabling tracing by users, not code. It should be possible to activate it by users, like with other bundles which provide tracing?

@iloveeclipse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In general looks good, assuming I've used it as expected, see my comments above.

@iloveeclipse
iloveeclipse requested a balanced review from Copilot September 3, 2026 14:51

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

Parallel statistics updates remain unsafe, and repeated failures can lose listener notifications.

Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.

Review details
  • Files reviewed: 13/13 changed files
  • Comments generated: 4
  • Review effort level: Balanced

@vogella
vogella force-pushed the per-builder-build-events branch from f2f88e7 to 53bcdae Compare September 3, 2026 15:27
@vogella

vogella commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@iloveeclipse let me know if you have more questions, I think I answered all.

@iloveeclipse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I miss tracing activation possibility by users, see above.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

Null-context events are double-counted, and debug-only builder timing can incorrectly produce performance logs.

Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.

Review details
  • Files reviewed: 13/13 changed files
  • Comments generated: 3
  • Review effort level: Balanced

@vogella

vogella commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

These are existing trace options, which are part of the launch configuration.

Screenshot From 2026-09-04 16-41-29

Once this is merged, I plan to promote my build monitor from draft to real PR to make it easier for the user to see the build time of the individual builders. Another way for the user to activate this is not planned by me.

Per-builder tracing already existed as org.eclipse.core.resources/perf/builders,
blaming the builder and using the project as context, but it never worked.
ResourceStats kept the in-progress PerformanceStats in a single static field, so
under parallel builds two builders overwrote each other's start time and any
notification triggered from inside a builder dropped that builder's timing
completely. PerformanceStats.startRun(context) also mutates the context of the
shared stats instance, and since context is part of its hashCode that corrupted
the key of an object already in the global stats map, so per-builder totals never
aggregated.

Each start now returns a handle that the matching end consumes, so runs are timed
independently across threads and nesting levels, and the elapsed time is recorded
through PerformanceStats.addRun, which leaves the shared context alone. The racy
BuildManager.timeStamp field used for build/invoking output is gone as well. A
builder run reaching the perf/builders threshold is logged like the project
refresh tracing added earlier, including the build kind, and the refresh case
reports the duration of the single run rather than the cumulative total.

Tracing enablement now follows the debug options instead of being frozen at
startup, so tooling can switch it on without a restart: core.runtime registers a
debug options listener that updates PerformanceStats.ENABLED, and the resources
trace flags are refreshed from the listener core.resources already had. Because a
bundle is only notified about its own options, the resources flags deliberately
track only perf/* of core.resources and consult the global flag separately, which
also makes a disable followed by a re-enable work. The threshold is now the
shortest duration still reported, so a threshold of 0 reports every occurrence
to performance listeners while writing nothing to the performance log, which lets
tooling gather statistics without flooding the log.
The processor keeps one pending entry per occurrence instead of one per event,
so repeated runs within its delay are no longer collapsed into a single
notification, and the counters are updated under a lock since runs of the same
event can now end concurrently. Listener statistics are removed regardless of
the tracing state, so a listener removed while tracing is off leaves no stale
entry behind.

Assisted-by: multiple AI agents and layers of automated tooling 🤖
@vogella
vogella force-pushed the per-builder-build-events branch from c6c9938 to d6ae001 Compare September 4, 2026 15:01
@iloveeclipse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

User currently has no way to change runtime bundle, trwcing options, see my comment above which. Please simply add the contribution to plugin xml, it is fully unrelated to additional bundle or view or whatever.

@vogella

vogella commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Why should this tracing option be special in how the user can activate it? We have tons of tracing options.

@iloveeclipse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Why should this tracing option be special in how the user can activate it? We have tons of tracing options.

Exact. It shouldn't be special, but it is special today because it is not exposed to user. You can only set it from debugger, but not from IDE, unlike many other tracing options. Just try to find it in your IDE.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants