Removing deprecated search label

[jilldoty-elastic]

Tiny change to remove reference to deprecated :Search/Search label.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: b557dc78-af46-4fee-851f-a192aae4cffe

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e010a12 and 178edcf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/contribute/configure-changelogs-ref.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation reference updates to configure-changelogs-ref.md. The pivot.areas example now demonstrates a GitHub label mapping using Search Relevance instead of Search. Formatting around the rules.bundle section adjusted for spacing clarity. Both changes are isolated to a single documentation file with no impact on code or public entities.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: removing a deprecated search label from the documentation.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description directly relates to the changeset, explaining the removal of a deprecated :Search/Search label reference.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

✨ Simplify code

• Create PR with simplified code
• Commit simplified code in branch cleanup_search_label

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[shainaraskas]

based on your other change, I think this is wrong

Suggested change

	| `pivot.areas` | Lists the valid area values. Optionally maps area names to GitHub labels (for example, `"Search Relevance": ":Search Relevance/Search"`). |
	| `pivot.areas` | Lists the valid area values. Optionally maps area names to GitHub labels (for example, `"Search": ":Search Relevance/Search"`). |

[jilldoty-elastic]

We want to remove the catch-all "Search" label - you have to be more specific now. "Search" should not map to "Search Relevance" - I just wanted to leave an example in this documentation.

[shainaraskas]

ok. I want @lcawl or @cotti to weigh in here because I don't know how these are used.

fwiw, your change in the other PR does map search directly to relevance. if that's not what you want, you probably need to make some further changes.

[jilldoty-elastic]

Fair, the other maps the general Search area to "Search Foundations" - it's the closest to the original purpose. I was concerned that removing it all together would break something.

[shainaraskas]

ah, reading too fast. will leave this for the others regardless :)

[reakaleek]

cc @lcawl @cotti

[Mpdreamz]

LGTM, this is only docs example with not impact. Trust @jilldoty-elastic knows best which labels are relevant 😸