Skip to content

release: Fleet-Ops v0.6.66 - #321

Open
roncodes wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
release/v0.6.66
Open

release: Fleet-Ops v0.6.66#321
roncodes wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
release/v0.6.66

Conversation

@roncodes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • open the Fleet-Ops v0.6.66 release branch
  • synchronize the extension, frontend package, and API package versions
  • prepare release notes for inspections and the map tile fix

Planned release work

  • inspection forms built from typed field groups, with a form builder
  • one inspection sheet for the console, the read-only record and public links, usable on phones and tablets
  • the driver-facing v1 inspections API
  • inspection links assignable to any user, protected by a PIN, and sent by email or SMS
  • a fix for place, zone and service area details failing to render on the map tile layer
  • coordinated Postman collection and CI seed updates

#319 and #320 target this release branch for review before the release is merged to main. Companion PRs: fleetbase/fleetops-data#77, fleetbase/fleetbase#652 and fleetbase/postman#60.

Verification

  • validated the modified JSON manifests parse successfully
  • checked the release metadata diff for whitespace errors

Opening a place's details threw "A resolved helper cannot be passed as a
named argument" and the details tab failed to render. The tile layers
passed the helper bare, as @url={{leaflet-tile-url}}, which Glimmer reads
as ambiguously a reference or an invocation and refuses. They invoke it
now, as @url={{(leaflet-tile-url)}}.

The same line was in the zone and service area details and the place
details and point map modals, all from the configurable tile provider
change (a5a4f1c), so each of them failed the same way. The helper's own
usage comment showed the broken form and is corrected.
fix(map): invoke leaflet-tile-url instead of passing it by name
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (2980fb3) to head (405b59a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main      #321   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity     10274     10274           
===========================================
  Files            545       545           
  Lines          39684     39684           
===========================================
  Hits           39684     39684           
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant