docs: clarify intelligent contract size expectations

[MuncleUscles]

Summary

• Adds a deployment note explaining that GenLayer Intelligent Contracts are Python/GenVM artifacts, not EVM bytecode.
• Gives practical guidance for keeping large contracts reviewable and lightweight.
• Clarifies that Solidity-specific patterns like diamond proxies are not the default answer to GenLayer contract-size questions.

Sanitized evidence basis

Recent builder/support discussion showed confusion about whether EVM bytecode-size limits apply to large GenLayer contracts. Existing deployment docs did not mention contract size or the EVM-bytecode distinction.

Test plan

• pnpm build ✅

Note: Created by weekly docs-and-skills gap loop; draft for human review.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for genlayer-docs ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	f048e87
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/genlayer-docs/deploys/6a7059d2db5ca50008ae62da
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-450--genlayer-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c8fd40cf-e513-4a24-94dd-234a6408b6a5

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}