docs: correct orchestrator invocation and timeout guarantees - #115
groupthinking wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
Includes: - Architecture diagram and lifecycle flow - Full API reference for all classes and methods - Customization guide (verification gates, reducers) - Protocol compatibility table (legacy vs new-style) - 5 usage examples (minimal, fan-out, heterogeneous, custom gate, step-by-step) - Integration reference with existing modules - Configuration tuning guidance - Error handling and escalation tiers
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughAdds ChangesHierarchicalOrchestrator Documentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🗺️ The plan divides, the map fans wide, Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a new, comprehensive Markdown document describing the orchestrator_mapreduce.py module (Plan → Map → Reduce flow, public API/classes, customization points, protocol calling behavior, persistence, and examples) to help developers integrate and extend the orchestrator.
Changes:
- Introduces full module documentation for
orchestrator_mapreduce.pyindocs/orchestrator_mapreduce.md. - Adds architecture/lifecycle diagrams, API reference, customization contracts, and usage examples.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/orchestrator_mapreduce.md`:
- Line 21: The fenced code block at line 21 in the orchestrator_mapreduce.md
file is missing a language identifier, which violates the MD040 markdown linting
rule. Add the language identifier `text` immediately after the opening triple
backticks on the line containing the fenced code block start marker to specify
that this is a text/ASCII art block, ensuring compliance with markdown
standards.
- Line 520: The fenced code block at line 520 in the orchestrator_mapreduce.md
file is missing a language identifier, which violates the MD040 Markdown linting
rule. Add the language identifier `text` to the opening of the fenced code block
(the line with the opening triple backticks) since this contains an ASCII
diagram. Change the opening ``` to ```text to specify that the content is plain
text.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 1cc1a810-26b5-4476-a2fa-6f3e527537c5
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/orchestrator_mapreduce.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Changes recommended
Resolve the two remaining documentation inconsistencies.
Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.
Review details
Suppressed comments (1)
docs/orchestrator_mapreduce.md:185
- This new clarification conflicts with the lifecycle diagram, which still shows
Apply timeoutfollowed unconditionally byTrack outcome. A reader can therefore still infer that timed-out subtasks are tracked, contrary to the implementation and the text here; update the diagram to show tracking only for successful returns and non-timeout exceptions.
- Tracks successful returns and non-timeout exceptions via `track_outcome()` (non-blocking, via `run_in_executor`); timeout failures are not sent to this tracker
- Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
- Comments generated: 1
- Review effort level: Lite
| **Illustrative new-style protocol (not the current `protocols/api_health_checker.py`):** | ||
|
|
||
| **Example — New-style protocol (`protocols/api_health_checker.py`):** | ||
| The repository's existing `api_health_checker.task()` takes no arguments and checks its own endpoint list. To use the parameterized examples, implement a separate protocol like the following and use its name in `task_list`: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@copilot Fix the code for all comments in this review comment.
When a review comment includes a suggested change, apply the suggestion exactly.
Do not make changes beyond what is described in the linked review comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔵 Needs a closer look
Update the remaining examples that pass inputs to the zero-argument health checker.
Review details
Suppressed comments (1)
docs/orchestrator_mapreduce.md:289
- This clarification still leaves the runnable endpoint examples above (lines 148–149) and in the fan-out section (lines 392–394) using
api_health_checkerwith per-endpoint inputs. That protocol is zero-argument, so_run_protocol_isolated()ignores those values and the examples do not validate the listed endpoints. Update both examples to use the separate parameterized protocol named by this section, or remove the per-endpoint inputs and describe the existing checker’s behavior.
The repository's existing `api_health_checker.task()` takes no arguments and checks its own endpoint list. To use the parameterized examples, implement a separate protocol like the following and use its name in `task_list`:
- Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
- Comments generated: 0 new
- Review effort level: Lite
Co-authored-by: groupthinking <154503486+groupthinking@users.noreply.github.com>
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Description
The original documentation is already present on master; before this update, this PR had an empty diff. This follow-up addresses all eight existing inline review findings in docs/orchestrator_mapreduce.md.
Type of change
Verification
Additional context
No runtime behavior changed; the Python edit preserves the complete AST. The nine checks used local fixtures and did not call external services. The initial verification harness had an import-path error after changing temporary directories; importing the loader before the directory change fixed the harness and the rerun passed.
Shell git push failed due to missing HTTPS credentials. The verified file was published through the authenticated GitHub connector in commit f051104. This PR is being completed under the user's explicit write/push/merge request.
Formatting correction published as 042c24f, addressing the Black CI failure supplied by the user. Remote CI results must be checked on this latest head.