Skip to content

ci(hypatia): standardise the wrapper caller id to the canonical hypatia - #74

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hypatia-caller-id
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hypatia-caller-id

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The check a reusable-caller job publishes is <caller job id> / <inner job display name>. The estate's canonical required context is hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis (docs/audits/audit-hypatia-pin-orphan-2026-05-27.adoc), so the caller job must be named hypatia. This wrapper named it scan, and so published scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis — two names for one gate, and any requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).

Rename only — the job body, its pin, its inputs and its secrets are byte-for-byte unchanged.

Audit-first, requirement-aware: this is --fix output from scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh in hyperpolymath/standards (the script stages; it never commits or pushes). The repository's active branch rulesets were read before the rename — no rule here names the old prefixed context, so the published name and every requirement stay in agreement.

…tia`

The check a reusable-caller job publishes is `<caller job id> / <inner job
display name>`. The estate's canonical required context is
`hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis`, so the caller job must be named
`hypatia`. This wrapper named it `scan` and so published
`scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis` — two names for one gate, and any
requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that
publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).

Rename only: the job body, its pin, inputs and secrets are byte-for-byte
unchanged. Audit-first, requirement-aware sweep —
hyperpolymath/standards scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 2cc02d30-907d-4c2b-af30-fa2c3aa59510

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ca7808 and fc53297.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (14)
  • GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
  • GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
  • GitHub Check: hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Empty-linter (invisible characters)
  • GitHub Check: Validate eclexiaiser manifest
  • GitHub Check: analyze (actions, none)
  • GitHub Check: Validate K9 contracts
  • GitHub Check: Hypatia neurosymbolic scan
  • GitHub Check: Validate A2ML manifests
  • GitHub Check: Zig FFI builds + tests (Zig 0.14.0)
  • GitHub Check: panic-attack assail
  • GitHub Check: Groove manifest check
  • GitHub Check: ABI ↔ FFI structural conformance
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml (1)

22-22: LGTM!


📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Renamed the Hypatia security scan workflow job for clearer identification in workflow results.

Walkthrough

The Hypatia security scan job in the GitHub Actions workflow is renamed from scan to hypatia. Its execution and reusable workflow reference are unchanged.

Changes

Hypatia scan workflow

Layer / File(s) Summary
Rename the workflow job
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml
The job identifier changes from scan to hypatia. The job body remains unchanged.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Bug fix

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description explains the rename, its purpose, and the unchanged job details. However, it does not follow the required template and omits the Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and S… Rewrite the description using the repository template. Add the required Summary and Changes sections, complete the RSR Quality Checklist, describe the testing performed, and state whether screenshots or terminal output are applicable.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the CI change: standardising the Hypatia wrapper caller ID to the canonical hypatia value.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description explains the rename, its purpose, and the unchanged job details. However, it does not follow the required template and omits the Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Screenshots sections, including test and quality-check results.

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit checks the scan by night
The job name now fits just right
Hypatia hops into the file
The workflow runs in tidy style
One small change, clear and bright

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 94f2981 into main Sep 20, 2026
18 of 21 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/hypatia-caller-id branch September 20, 2026 23:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant