Skip to content

removeValue and removeAll are async, which breaks the assumption of Dictionary #5

Description

@nikbhatt-cu

The implementation of removeValue and removeAll uses self.concurrentQueue.async, which results in a different behavior vs. the regular dictionary. This means it's not a fully drop-in replacement.

If a caller removes a value and then that caller (or a caller of the caller) checks the dictionary, it may still contain the value (for an indeterminate amount of time).

May I ask why these calls must be async?
Thanks.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions