[gletort]

If update-site or update-site-unlisted field are filled in the header, will head a component in the statbox to directly see the name (listed) or the url (unlisted) of the update site

[hinerm]

@gletort I tested this and when update-site is specified with a name, you get an incorrect relative url just to that name.

To me, the unlisted url is potentially helpful. Although, if someone is contributing a wiki page I'm not sure why they wouldn't also contribute their update site to the list.

For listed update sites, I'm less sure a link is useful, since a user wouldn't actually use that url when enabling the site in Fiji.

What do you think? What goals did you want to achieve with this change?

[gletort]

Thanks @hinerm for looking into this. My goal was only to get a direct information on how to install the plugin, so that people can directly see which update site to add, if it's listed or unlisted, without having to go through all the documentation. So I totally agree that there is no need for a link in the case of a listed site, just to have the name of this update site is enough!