ResponseDetails does not use MessageGeneralStatus

[frq-asgard-toge]

Hello,

am I correct in seeing that SMS responses (SmsResponseDetails) have the groupName as an enum (inside SmsMessageStatus), while other channel responses store it as a String?

From what I can tell from the public API documentation the values are the same (or at least they appear to be).
Is there any reason why one is a String and the other is an enum? Can an API consumer expect these status types to always be the equal regardless of their type in the API client?

Kind regards

[dnumicmesa]

Hi @frq-asgard-toge ,

thank you for reporting your observation. According to API documentation for supported endpoints they should be same, just with a difference in type in these SDK models. We will consider unifying MessageStatus models in next release to a single one with field 'groupName' being of type enum.

Kind regards

[frq-asgard-toge]

@dnumicmesa Hello, I saw that in 7.0.0 you got rid of SmsMessageStatus in favour of the MessageStatus, which is already a nice change. Is there a reason why the groupName field is still a String and not a MessageGeneralStatus enum object?

[dnumicmesa]

Hey @frq-asgard-toge , we opted to release it this way to combat any future incompatibility with new enum values under MessageGeneralStatus. So this way, any response statuses that are added in backend would not break SDK and would not require immediate response adjustments.