fix(docs): clarify local-only first audit

[jaruesink]

Summary

• remove the redundant provider fallback beneath the already-local-only homepage command
• refresh generated llms-full.txt metadata through the docs build

Verification

• bun run lint
• bun run format:check
• bun run typecheck
• bun test
• bun run --cwd docs-site build
• rendered homepage checked at 390×844 and 1440×1000; the contradictory sentence is absent and both local-only and AI-backed routes remain clear

Linear

• Resolves SFD-252

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fd7df32f-ae4b-46ec-b1f1-4a92b494bb94

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41a7e0f and 892a963.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• docs-site/public/llms-full.txt
• docs-site/src/content/docs/index.mdx

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the documentation generation timestamp.
  • Refined first-audit guidance for local-only setups.
  • Added links to installation and first-audit instructions for AI-backed workflows and alternate launch options.
  • Removed outdated guidance to rerun audits with the --ci option when no provider is available.

Walkthrough

The documentation updates revise first-audit guidance and change the generated timestamp in the bundled LLM documentation.

Changes

Documentation updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Documentation guidance and metadata docs-site/src/content/docs/index.mdx, docs-site/public/llms-full.txt	First-audit guidance now links to installation and first-audit documentation, and the generated timestamp changes to 2026-07-17.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly captures the docs change to clarify the local-only first audit guidance.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description covers summary, verification, and issue link, but it omits the template's review checklist section.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch scout/sfd-252-homepage-copy

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}