Repository navigation
dataset(code-review): add reaction gold answers from BCApps PR 12152-neg-pr12152-20261020 - #981
Draft
Wenjie Fan (gggdttt) wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…neg-pr12152-20261020
Contributor
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds code-review gold answers from explicit BCApps PR feedback.
Negative guards use exact source-file patches at immutable reviewed revisions, not invented synthetic code. Their targets are omitted from both expected and ignored comments; new negative-only entries have no expected findings.
Existing eligible gold answers are reused without changing their payloads.
Accepted findings
Rejected findings
Knowledge dependency
Validation
See the gate-owned offline evaluation section below.
Generated by the BC-ALAgentsInternal self-improvement workflow.
Offline evaluation: regression
Candidate correctness failed: unexpected or missed findings remain. Existing ignored gold comments retain their neutral scoring semantics.
Preparation attempt 1: validated.
Selection: new. New:
synthetic__testing-transactionmodel-not-required-01. Reused (complete payloads): ``.synthetic__testing-transactionmodel-not-required-01/false_positive_guard/ [MCP] Clear environment description after environment copy BCApps#12152 (comment): Thumbs-down feedback plus the maintainer reply rejecting TransactionModel usage altogether (property should be removed from the product) show the AutoCommit->AutoRollback suggestion was wrong in substance, not just severity; the accepted fix deleted the attribute instead. No expected or ignored comment exists for this target in the dataset, so a guard expecting no finding on the TransactionModel line is faithful without inventing a clean precondition.Coverage references and outcome shapes are validated mechanically. Semantic equivalence, severity calibration and recommendation quality are NOT proved by these checks or a matching F1.
Common engine code:
ecf8e31759d6ddd6d78e3a0b7836b40134368009; dataset SHA256:8A36A70E92D9C5D6ADB179F4BB39A29409B116ACE8CB29764A4DF2E3E2DF9383.Model:
gpt-5.6-luna; judge:gpt-5.3-codex. Exact D:synthetic__testing-transactionmodel-not-required-01.Dataset base:
7c98b750c200d88ed0a81daaea5e71184a3af01b; candidate:3b3dfd9de5459cb4fc2f71285a4b6681249f8169.f4ee822aa76bed8d018029d2a6d3deb7db59a53079439b9347c5e3d8d6b3b681dad25d23fb64ac03ce45c5abd9a35d5dbd48f51f6b5a10a418c7f70dfb05910bc418a431dc0579cfea243728d3d76eaf6aebeecf0606079cdc2ea30b2031a78ee09b2644920291ddfa352f43ec90e7539c0bf3c645afadbbBaseline
Run: https://github.com/microsoft/BC-Bench/actions/runs/39436917453; conclusion: success; wall clock: 7.4 minutes.
Raw findings and runtime pin proofs are retained in the self-improvement-feedback artifact and the linked evaluation run.
synthetic__testing-transactionmodel-not-required-01Observed AI credits: unavailable; coverage 0/1 entries. Missing entries are not extrapolated into a total; reported amounts do not attest full credit coverage.
Candidate
Run: https://github.com/microsoft/BC-Bench/actions/runs/39438081729; conclusion: success; wall clock: 6.8 minutes.
Raw findings and runtime pin proofs are retained in the self-improvement-feedback artifact and the linked evaluation run.
synthetic__testing-transactionmodel-not-required-01Observed AI credits: unavailable; coverage 0/1 entries. Missing entries are not extrapolated into a total; reported amounts do not attest full credit coverage.
Missing telemetry is unavailable, not zero. Evaluation-only metrics exclude candidate generation and are not the full-cycle cost.
Human review must verify source-patch fidelity, gold correctness, and target attribution. No automatic merge or branch-protection claim is made.
Cycle usage and elapsed time (running, as of 2026-10-20T14:26:14.3049835+00:00)
Orchestrator work: 1186.404 seconds. This is not the completed GitHub workflow duration.
Subtotals are CLI/Bench-reported usage, not invoices. Missing values are not zero. Emitted-span coverage does not prove complete child/background billing; judge usage is not exported. Premium requests are not AI credits or currency.
Nested stage, agent and API durations are not added into cycle wall clock. Root queue/setup, telemetry export, artifact upload and later dashboard publication are excluded.
PR evidence is an as-of snapshot before publication completes. Final-for-orchestrator metrics are emitted to self-improvement-cycle.json in the root self-improvement-feedback artifact and its Actions summary when persistence succeeds; a running checkpoint is not final evidence.
Root run: https://github.com/microsoft/BC-ALAgentsInternal/actions/runs/39436159441/attempts/1