Skip to content

W-23997997: Remove on-premises from the control-plane compatibility matrix - #488

Merged
kevintroller merged 3 commits into
latestfrom
W-23997997-hosting-on-prem-from-latest-kt
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

W-23997997: Remove on-premises from the control-plane compatibility matrix#488
kevintroller merged 3 commits into
latestfrom
W-23997997-hosting-on-prem-from-latest-kt

Conversation

@kevintroller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Replaces #486, which could not merge after Control Planes #487 landed on latest.
  • The On-Premises row is already gone from the matrix on latest. This PR keeps Beth's intro: on-premises isn't listed because it does not require a control plane; registering the Runtime Manager agent makes that instance Hybrid Standalone.
  • Points to xref:mule-runtime::mule-standalone.adoc[Run Mule Runtime Engine On-Premises].

Test plan

  • Hosting Options matrix still has four runtime rows (CH2, CloudHub, RTF, Hybrid Standalone Runtimes).
  • Compatibility intro explains why on-premises is omitted and how it relates to Hybrid.
  • The xref to Run Mule Runtime Engine On-Premises resolves.

… matrix.

Unregistered Mule is not a Runtime Manager deploy target. Registering the agent makes that instance Hybrid Standalone.
Comment thread control-planes/modules/ROOT/pages/creating-and-deploying-mule-apps.adoc Outdated
Co-authored-by: Cristian-Venticinque <46459586+Cristian-Venticinque@users.noreply.github.com>
@kevintroller
kevintroller merged commit 8d39ac9 into latest Aug 31, 2026
2 checks passed
@kevintroller
kevintroller deleted the W-23997997-hosting-on-prem-from-latest-kt branch August 31, 2026 14:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants