Repository navigation
feat: Node.js v22.23.5, v24.22.3, v26.13.1 - #2692
Conversation
|
https://status.canonical.com/#/ is suffering from a major outage, affecting also the availability of:
used to verify the Docker builds. The checks are able to verify the builds for Node.js 26 only. Unfortunately for Node.js 22 and 24, they rely on checking also Yarn v1 Classic, and that key has a single point of failure with the Ubuntu key server. |
|
@MikeMcC399 can you re-run the build? Canonical is declaring keyserver is operational again. |
I retried, however it's not working yet from within GitHub. There may be some network delays / caching etc. We will try again soon. Locally I'm able to check |
|
In case the Ubuntu keyserver stays unreachable from GitHub runners for longer: I opened #2693, which adds a third source for the Yarn v1 key ( Since the update workflow regenerates Of course, if the keyserver recovers first, a re-run here is all that's needed. |
|
Although https://status.canonical.com/#/ states that their keyservers are observed operational, that is not what we are seeing in GitHub, and not what I see locally: 16.45 + gpg --batch --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 6A010C5166006599AA17F08146C2130DFD2497F5
61.79 gpg: keyserver receive failed: Connection timed outThis keyserver is used to build many of the other official images published by Docker on the official images Docker Hub site, so it's going to be affecting many pending builds. Please bear in mind that building the images generally takes several hours for all the architectures involved. It is never an immediate release. See https://github.com/nodejs/docker-node#release-availability for links to background information. We will continue tracking. |
nschonni
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Although there is still the failure for the Yarn key check, I think this can land. It will either not be an issue with the Dockerhub CI or will stall the same there
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
|
Let's land it and pass it on to the official site, we can add a comment there. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
|
It only caused the comment posting to fail -- the PR at docker-library/official-images#22729 was updated successfully. |
|
Thanks! @tianon I should have checked there first! |
|
GitHub Actions is now able to build all images again, so it should also be good in the official Docker images environment. |
If you are reading this PR soon after it has been merged, you may find that new Docker images are missing or appear broken. Check back later and see the README for background information.