Skip to content

Prepare for next version of node/ocean.js#159

Open
alexcos20 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/next-node-4
Open

Prepare for next version of node/ocean.js#159
alexcos20 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/next-node-4

Conversation

@alexcos20

@alexcos20 alexcos20 commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes # .

Changes proposed in this PR:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated a core library dependency to a newer pre-release version, which may include compatibility improvements and upcoming fixes.

@alexcos20 alexcos20 self-assigned this Jul 9, 2026
@alexcos20 alexcos20 added the doNotMerge not merge yet label Jul 9, 2026
@alexcos20 alexcos20 requested a review from andreip136 as a code owner July 9, 2026 11:05
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@alexcos20, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 57 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 75241258-8d8b-4417-8ef9-57fc13af9af2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1596062 and 8c76130.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The package.json dependency entry for @oceanprotocol/lib was updated from version ^8.0.6 to ^9.0.0-next.1.

Changes

Dependency Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Bump @oceanprotocol/lib version
package.json
Updated the @oceanprotocol/lib dependency version constraint from ^8.0.6 to ^9.0.0-next.1.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title matches the PR intent to prepare node/ocean.js for the next version and aligns with the dependency update.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/next-node-4

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

doNotMerge not merge yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant