test(runtime): share bundled runtime source loader

[mldangelo-oai]

Summary

Read and decompress the bundled runtime once for tests that inspect its immutable source.

Changes

• Add a lazily cached runtime-source loader to the existing plugin test helper.
• Reuse it in completed-scan handoff, prompt-only timeout, Deep reducer recovery, and Deep worker shutdown tests.
• Keep each test's function evaluation and synthetic runtime dependencies independent.

Testing

• bun test tests-ts/completed-scan-handoff.test.ts tests-ts/prompt-only-start-timeout.test.ts tests-ts/deep-scan-reducer-recovery.test.ts tests-ts/deep-scan-worker-shutdown.test.ts --timeout 30000 (9 passed).
• bun test tests-ts/runtime.test.ts --timeout 30000 (117 passed; 7 platform-specific tests skipped).
• pnpm --pm-on-fail=ignore run types.
• prettier --check for all five changed test files.
• git diff --check.

Risk and rollout

Test-only cleanup. Only immutable decompressed source is cached; evaluated functions, fixture objects, cancellation behavior, and production packages remain unchanged.

Public disclosure review

• No customer, partner, prospect, or user identities, data, or identifying details are included.
• No credentials, personal data, private source, scan findings, or nonpublic links or tickets are included.
• I reviewed the branch name, title, description, commits, changes, comments, logs, screenshots, attachments, and links for public disclosure.

[mldangelo-oai]

@codex review

[mldangelo-oai]

@codex security review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

Reviewed commit: 543f79daf5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 543f79daf5

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.