Fix check in auth test for 1.37 given new NamedAuthorizer behavior - #31574
Fix check in auth test for 1.37 given new NamedAuthorizer behavior#31574jacobsee wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 11 remain after this review. WalkthroughThe authorization test now matches unsafe proxy denial paths and reasons separately. This supports Kubernetes 1.37 authorizer-name prefixes in denial messages. ChangesAuthorization test matching
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This is a localized authentication test adjustment with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining after normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files. Full details: Stable And Deterministic Test NamesExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only the Full details: Test Structure And QualityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only the unsafe-error matcher in the existing Full details: Microshift Test CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only the existing Full details: Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The PR does not add a new Ginkgo test. It only changes error matching in the existing Full details: Topology-Aware Scheduling CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only Full details: Ote Binary Stdout ContractExplanation PASS. The commit changes only Full details: Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only error matching in an existing Ginkgo test. The diff adds no test declarations, IPv4 assumptions, IP parsing, URLs, or external connectivity. The test uses Kubernetes API clients and an in-cluster proxy path. Full details: No-Weak-CryptoExplanation The pull request changes one authorization test file. The added code only splits matching of Kubernetes proxy denial text into two Full details: Container-PrivilegesExplanation PASS. The pull request changes only Full details: No-Sensitive-Data-In-LogsExplanation PASS. The pull request changes only error-string matching in ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jacobsee The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes. Rationale: The job failed in the pre phase while installing MicroShift, before any conformance or authorization tests ran. Evidence:
If you disagree with this assessment, AI-generated. Review for accuracy. |
|
@redhat-chai-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of redhat-chai-bot: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@jacobsee: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Summary by CodeRabbit