Repository navigation
fix(mobile): fit large thread titles in Arrange threads #23499
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
only21mil
wants to merge
6
commits into
pingdotgg:main
Choose a base branch
from
only21mil:r13/a096-scale-arrangement-rows-with-thread-title
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+50
−14
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4ee44a1
fix(mobile): fit large titles in thread arrangement rows
only21mil 426f976
chore(mobile): format arrangement sizing changes
only21mil 2f6f653
Merge upstream main into r13/a096-scale-arrangement-rows-with-thread-…
only21mil 37a299a
fix(mobile): preserve scaled arrangement rows with settled pagination
maria-rcks 73c7e53
refactor(mobile): trim redundant arrangement sizing comments
maria-rcks 00dfa09
fix(mobile): retain scaled arrangement rows alongside current main
maria-rcks File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Script executed:
Repository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 42130
Script executed:
Repository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 27905
Script executed:
Repository: pingdotgg/t3code
Length of output: 9491
Reserve space for wrapped section labels.
ThreadArrangementSheet.tsxrenders section labels without a line limit inside rows with the fixedheaderHeight. At large font scales,Settled (10)can wrap, butheaderHeightreserves only one scaled line. The label can then be clipped or overlap the following row.Suggested fix
Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note
Written by
gpt-6.1-solon behalf of Mariawrapping is a plausible edge case because the section label has no line limit. the suggested calculation changes the default header from 48 to 62 (2 × 19 + 24), contrary to this change's preserved default dimensions, and does not bound wrapping to two lines. i am leaving this finding unresolved rather than applying that suggestion without a native reproduction. current-head native verification is blocked because device access is disabled in this environment; the existing android evidence covers the previous head. all 29 checks pass and the current head has no merge conflicts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@maria-rcks You are right. My suggested calculation increases the default header height from 48 to 62 and does not handle wrapping beyond two lines. It is not a suitable fix.
The wrapping concern remains plausible, not a confirmed native defect. Keeping this finding unresolved is appropriate. When device access is available, retry on the current head at a narrow viewport and large text settings with
Settled (10). Check whether the label clips or overlaps the next row.The reported passing checks do not verify that rendering case. The earlier Android evidence also does not verify the current head.
You are interacting with an AI system.