Gate releases on a live benchmark regression check - #125
Merged
Conversation
Add bench/src/compare-baseline.ts and a bun run bench:compare script that compares a diff-file live benchmark run against a committed bench/baseline.json: authored-target detection rate, false/unrelated finding count, gate-verdict correctness (does the CLI's exit code agree with the authored must-block classification), mean provider cost per case, and p95 latency. Tolerances are loose enough to absorb ordinary run-to-run inference variance from a single nondeterministic model call per case, but catch a real regression; a fixture- corpus or evaluator-source hash mismatch fails loudly instead of silently comparing against a stale baseline. --record is the only path that writes baseline.json, keeping re-baselining a deliberate operator action. Wire a bench-live job into the release workflow, between tag validation and the build matrix, that builds the plain release binary, runs the full 70- fixture corpus against z-ai/glm-5.2 through bench:live, and blocks the release on bench:compare exiting non-zero. bench/baseline.json is populated from a real live run against this worktree's binary (70 cases, $0.29 provider cost): 55/57 authored-target detections, 4 false positives, 76.8% gate-verdict correctness, and p50/p95 latency of 4.5s/48.6s.
![postil-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/3455612?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 finding in review details
- PR description claims p95 latency is lower than detection rate in pull request description: The description says 'p50/p95 latency of 4.5 and 48.6 seconds, the last of these lower than detection rate because it also penalizes a must-block defect reported at warn.' The 'last of these' refers to p95 latency (48.585s per bench/baseline.json line 21), but 48.585 seconds is not 'lower than' the detection rate of 0.965 (line 15) — the units are incomparable. The explanation about penalizing a must-block defect applies to gate-verdict correctness (76.8%, line 17), which is indeed lower than detection rate (96.5%). The sentence as written contradicts baseline.json. Fix the referent: clarify that gate-verdict correctness, not p95 latency, is lower than detection rate because it penalizes must-block defects reported at warn.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The release workflow runs the live diff-file benchmark and compares it against a committed baseline, and the build job depends on that comparison, so a review-quality regression blocks the release. The comparison gates authored-target detection rate, false and unrelated finding counts, gate-verdict correctness, mean provider cost per case, and p95 latency, and fails loudly when the fixture corpus hash no longer matches the baseline so a stale comparison cannot pass quietly; re-baselining is a deliberate documented step. The baseline records a real run of the current binary over all seventy fixtures at $0.29 of provider cost: 55 of 57 authored-target detections, four false positives, 76.8 percent gate-verdict correctness, and p50/p95 latency of 4.5 and 48.6 seconds, the last of these lower than detection rate because it also penalizes a must-block defect reported at warn.