-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.9k
gh-153364: Add frame limit in get_async_stack_trace() and parse_coro_chain()
#153365
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
4dd6f49
e71aaa5
116da45
3e12939
c46810c
dd6e19a
0972e00
3c5f78b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
| Add limits to frame and coroutine-chain walks in the Tachyon sampling | ||
| profiler. This avoids potential hangs. Patch by Maurycy Pawłowski-Wieroński. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ handle_yield_from_frame( | |
| RemoteUnwinderObject *unwinder, | ||
| uintptr_t gi_iframe_addr, | ||
| uintptr_t gen_type_addr, | ||
| PyObject *render_to | ||
| PyObject *render_to, | ||
| size_t depth | ||
| ) { | ||
| // Read the entire interpreter frame at once | ||
| char iframe[SIZEOF_INTERP_FRAME]; | ||
|
|
@@ -309,7 +310,8 @@ handle_yield_from_frame( | |
| doesn't match the type of whatever it points to | ||
| in its cr_await. | ||
| */ | ||
| err = parse_coro_chain(unwinder, gi_await_addr, render_to); | ||
| err = parse_coro_chain(unwinder, gi_await_addr, render_to, | ||
| depth + 1); | ||
| if (err) { | ||
| set_exception_cause(unwinder, PyExc_RuntimeError, "Failed to parse coroutine chain in yield_from"); | ||
| return -1; | ||
|
|
@@ -325,10 +327,19 @@ int | |
| parse_coro_chain( | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Does it actually need to be recursive? To put aside recursive v. iterative; CS101 strikes: if you ask me, I was thinking about a visited set here... not applicable to this fix but
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
| RemoteUnwinderObject *unwinder, | ||
| uintptr_t coro_address, | ||
| PyObject *render_to | ||
| PyObject *render_to, | ||
| size_t depth | ||
| ) { | ||
| assert((void*)coro_address != NULL); | ||
|
|
||
| if (depth >= MAX_FRAME_CHAIN_DEPTH) { | ||
| PyErr_SetString(PyExc_RuntimeError, | ||
| "Too many coroutine frames (possible infinite loop)"); | ||
| set_exception_cause(unwinder, PyExc_RuntimeError, | ||
| "Coroutine chain depth limit exceeded"); | ||
| return -1; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Read the entire generator object at once | ||
| char gen_object[SIZEOF_GEN_OBJ]; | ||
| int err = _Py_RemoteDebug_PagedReadRemoteMemory( | ||
|
|
@@ -371,7 +382,8 @@ parse_coro_chain( | |
| Py_DECREF(name); | ||
|
|
||
| if (frame_state == FRAME_SUSPENDED_YIELD_FROM) { | ||
| return handle_yield_from_frame(unwinder, gi_iframe_addr, gen_type_addr, render_to); | ||
| return handle_yield_from_frame(unwinder, gi_iframe_addr, gen_type_addr, | ||
| render_to, depth); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return 0; | ||
|
|
@@ -417,7 +429,7 @@ create_task_result( | |
| coro_addr = GET_MEMBER_NO_TAG(uintptr_t, task_obj, unwinder->async_debug_offsets.asyncio_task_object.task_coro); | ||
|
|
||
| if ((void*)coro_addr != NULL) { | ||
| if (parse_coro_chain(unwinder, coro_addr, call_stack) < 0) { | ||
| if (parse_coro_chain(unwinder, coro_addr, call_stack, 0) < 0) { | ||
| set_exception_cause(unwinder, PyExc_RuntimeError, "Failed to parse coroutine chain"); | ||
| goto error; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
@@ -776,7 +788,13 @@ parse_async_frame_chain( | |
| return -1; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| size_t frame_count = 0; | ||
| while ((void*)address_of_current_frame != NULL) { | ||
| if (++frame_count > MAX_FRAME_CHAIN_DEPTH) { | ||
| PyErr_SetString(PyExc_RuntimeError, "Too many async stack frames (possible infinite loop)"); | ||
| set_exception_cause(unwinder, PyExc_RuntimeError, "Async frame chain iteration limit exceeded"); | ||
| return -1; | ||
| } | ||
| PyObject* frame_info = NULL; | ||
| uintptr_t address_of_code_object; | ||
| int res = parse_frame_object( | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not the scope but maybe
MAX_THREADS,MAX_STACK_CHUNKS,MAX_LINETABLE_ENTRIESorMAX_ITERATIONSare worth keeping here too