Skip to content

Over 20 benchmarks fail to run on Python 3.14.0 #416

Closed

Description

@Lewoniewski

After updating to Python 3.14.0, more than 20 benchmarks fail to run that did not occur in previous versions (e.g., Python 3.13.x). This issue was reproduced on Win 11 with AMD and Intel processors.

Will this issue be addressed or fixed for compatibility with Python 3.14?

Activity

  1. maurycy commented on Oct 15, 2025

    @maurycy
    Contributor

    For reference, 3.15:

    22 benchmarks failed:
    - async_tree
    - async_tree_cpu_io_mixed
    - async_tree_cpu_io_mixed_tg
    - async_tree_eager
    - async_tree_eager_cpu_io_mixed
    - async_tree_eager_cpu_io_mixed_tg
    - async_tree_eager_io
    - async_tree_eager_io_tg
    - async_tree_eager_memoization
    - async_tree_eager_memoization_tg
    - async_tree_eager_tg
    - async_tree_io
    - async_tree_io_tg
    - async_tree_memoization
    - async_tree_memoization_tg
    - async_tree_tg
    - chameleon
    - django_template
    - sqlalchemy_declarative
    - sqlalchemy_imperative
    - sympy
    - tornado_http
    

    typescript.txt

  2. Lewoniewski commented on Oct 19, 2025

    @Lewoniewski
    Author

    @maurycy, thanks, I have the following list for AMD processor:

    21 benchmarks failed:

    • async_tree
    • async_tree_cpu_io_mixed
    • async_tree_cpu_io_mixed_tg
    • async_tree_eager
    • async_tree_eager_cpu_io_mixed
    • async_tree_eager_cpu_io_mixed_tg
    • async_tree_eager_io
    • async_tree_eager_io_tg
    • async_tree_eager_memoization
    • async_tree_eager_memoization_tg
    • async_tree_eager_tg
    • async_tree_io
    • async_tree_io_tg
    • async_tree_memoization
    • async_tree_memoization_tg
    • async_tree_tg
    • asyncio_websockets
    • chameleon
    • sqlalchemy_declarative
    • sqlalchemy_imperative
    • tornado_http
  3. maurycy commented on Oct 24, 2025

    @maurycy
    Contributor

    @hugovk @diegorusso I reran the whole suite on 3.14 and 3.15-dev, and all seems to be good now, unless I'm missing something:

  4. hugovk commented on Oct 24, 2025

    @hugovk
    Member

    #417 was merged earlier, thanks for testing!

  5. maurycy commented on Oct 24, 2025

    @maurycy
    Contributor
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions